Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3826

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:48, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3826_temporal_cerebellum_brain_occipital_optic_duodenum_parietal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr19:57183114..57183145,-p1@ZNF835
Hg19::chr19:58446721..58446779,-p1@ZNF418
Hg19::chr19:58514229..58514279,+p1@LOC100128398


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.22e-46115
neural tube6.79e-3457
neural rod6.79e-3457
future spinal cord6.79e-3457
neural keel6.79e-3457
regional part of nervous system6.66e-3394
nervous system6.66e-3394
central nervous system2.97e-3182
regional part of brain7.62e-2959
neurectoderm4.65e-2890
neural plate6.28e-2786
presumptive neural plate6.28e-2786
anterior neural tube5.18e-2642
regional part of forebrain7.10e-2641
forebrain7.10e-2641
future forebrain7.10e-2641
brain5.83e-2569
future brain5.83e-2569
ectoderm6.62e-22173
presumptive ectoderm6.62e-22173
telencephalon1.33e-2134
gray matter1.65e-2134
brain grey matter1.65e-2134
regional part of telencephalon4.97e-2133
ectoderm-derived structure8.03e-21169
cerebral hemisphere2.77e-2032
pre-chordal neural plate8.76e-2061
anterior region of body3.68e-17129
craniocervical region3.68e-17129
head1.33e-16123
cerebral cortex3.68e-1625
pallium3.68e-1625
regional part of cerebral cortex3.06e-1522
neocortex3.71e-1420
posterior neural tube6.05e-0915
chordal neural plate6.05e-0915
segmental subdivision of nervous system6.52e-0813
segmental subdivision of hindbrain2.94e-0712
hindbrain2.94e-0712
presumptive hindbrain2.94e-0712
basal ganglion7.88e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis7.88e-079
aggregate regional part of brain7.88e-079
collection of basal ganglia7.88e-079
cerebral subcortex7.88e-079
nucleus of brain8.36e-079
neural nucleus8.36e-079


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
SIX5#147912211.3911435703060.009873820081429030.0370752820696184
ZNF143#7702313.50087655222790.0004062804962997170.00389101593333756



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.