Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1623

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:11, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr12:45430179..45430196,+p@chr12:45430179..45430196
+
Mm9::chr2:12932442..12932491,-p3@C1ql3
Mm9::chr2:12932701..12932734,-p5@C1ql3
Mm9::chr2:12933383..12933405,-p7@C1ql3
Mm9::chr5:81450660..81450671,+p17@Lphn3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
ectodermal cell6.08e-1244
neurectodermal cell6.08e-1244
neural cell1.99e-1143
non-terminally differentiated cell1.13e-0849
neuron1.26e-0833
neuronal stem cell1.26e-0833
neuroblast1.26e-0833
electrically signaling cell1.26e-0833
CNS neuron (sensu Vertebrata)1.07e-0723
neuroblast (sensu Vertebrata)1.07e-0723

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
ectoderm-derived structure5.10e-3195
ectoderm5.10e-3195
presumptive ectoderm5.10e-3195
nervous system1.31e-2875
central nervous system1.06e-2673
neurectoderm3.83e-2564
neural plate3.83e-2564
presumptive neural plate3.83e-2564
ecto-epithelium2.66e-2473
regional part of nervous system1.97e-2254
neural tube3.47e-2152
neural rod3.47e-2152
future spinal cord3.47e-2152
neural keel3.47e-2152
pre-chordal neural plate7.52e-1949
brain1.66e-1747
future brain1.66e-1747
regional part of brain8.53e-1746
gray matter2.28e-1634
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest4.98e-1692
anterior neural tube3.98e-1440
regional part of forebrain1.85e-1339
forebrain1.85e-1339
future forebrain1.85e-1339
brain grey matter7.61e-1329
regional part of telencephalon7.61e-1329
telencephalon7.61e-1329
regional part of cerebral cortex4.58e-1017
occipital lobe2.39e-0910
visual cortex2.39e-0910
neocortex2.39e-0910
cerebral cortex1.76e-0821
cerebral hemisphere1.76e-0821
pallium1.76e-0821
posterior neural tube5.04e-0812
chordal neural plate5.04e-0812


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}