Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2993

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:21, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr15:68758810..68758823,+p4@Khdrbs3
Mm9::chr15:68758825..68758839,+p2@Khdrbs3
Mm9::chr15:68758844..68758851,+p5@Khdrbs3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.10e-2892
nervous system2.97e-2675
central nervous system3.68e-2673
neurectoderm4.42e-2664
neural plate4.42e-2664
presumptive neural plate4.42e-2664
ectoderm-derived structure5.63e-2595
ectoderm5.63e-2595
presumptive ectoderm5.63e-2595
pre-chordal neural plate2.25e-2349
regional part of nervous system1.39e-2254
ecto-epithelium7.75e-2273
neural tube3.88e-2152
neural rod3.88e-2152
future spinal cord3.88e-2152
neural keel3.88e-2152
gray matter4.19e-2034
anterior neural tube1.44e-1940
regional part of forebrain3.03e-1939
forebrain3.03e-1939
future forebrain3.03e-1939
regional part of brain2.95e-1846
brain4.33e-1847
future brain4.33e-1847
brain grey matter1.62e-1729
regional part of telencephalon1.62e-1729
telencephalon1.62e-1729
cerebral cortex1.03e-1321
cerebral hemisphere1.03e-1321
pallium1.03e-1321
tube1.12e-13114
anatomical conduit4.22e-13122
regional part of cerebral cortex3.94e-1117
embryo3.00e-09320
occipital lobe3.72e-0810
visual cortex3.72e-0810
neocortex3.72e-0810
multi-cellular organism5.15e-07333


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}