Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3527

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:12, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr5:69732776..69732786,-p5@Kctd8
Mm9::chr5:69732791..69732807,-p1@Kctd8
Mm9::chr5:69732812..69732821,-p4@Kctd8


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
CNS neuron (sensu Vertebrata)1.79e-1023
neuroblast (sensu Vertebrata)1.79e-1023

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neurectoderm1.61e-2164
neural plate1.61e-2164
presumptive neural plate1.61e-2164
regional part of nervous system3.11e-1954
neural tube3.21e-1852
neural rod3.21e-1852
future spinal cord3.21e-1852
neural keel3.21e-1852
ecto-epithelium3.66e-1873
pre-chordal neural plate9.96e-1849
ectoderm-derived structure3.56e-1795
ectoderm3.56e-1795
presumptive ectoderm3.56e-1795
central nervous system4.39e-1773
nervous system1.35e-1675
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest8.22e-1592
brain1.42e-1447
future brain1.42e-1447
gray matter2.33e-1434
regional part of brain6.91e-1446
anterior neural tube1.23e-1240
regional part of forebrain5.21e-1239
forebrain5.21e-1239
future forebrain5.21e-1239
brain grey matter9.30e-1129
regional part of telencephalon9.30e-1129
telencephalon9.30e-1129
tube4.27e-08114
anatomical conduit2.46e-07122
occipital lobe3.10e-0710
visual cortex3.10e-0710
neocortex3.10e-0710


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}