Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3533

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:11, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3533_Neutrophils_CD14_Eosinophils_Monocytederived_lymph_blood_optic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr16:11643014..11643095,-p@chr16:11643014..11643095
-
Hg19::chr1:111435023..111435051,+p@chr1:111435023..111435051
+
Hg19::chr21:46330677..46330701,-p5@ITGB2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte4.62e-78136
nongranular leukocyte8.43e-70115
hematopoietic stem cell2.26e-67168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.26e-67168
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.59e-67120
hematopoietic cell1.56e-65177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell9.61e-65161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell9.61e-65161
myeloid leukocyte8.22e-6072
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.24e-5267
monopoietic cell1.25e-5159
monocyte1.25e-5159
monoblast1.25e-5159
promonocyte1.25e-5159
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.56e-5166
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.15e-5161
defensive cell3.29e-5148
phagocyte3.29e-5148
classical monocyte2.99e-4542
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.99e-4542
myeloid cell1.10e-44108
common myeloid progenitor1.10e-44108
stuff accumulating cell2.57e-2087
lymphocyte6.40e-1753
common lymphoid progenitor6.40e-1753
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.78e-1652
nucleate cell7.46e-1655
mesenchymal cell1.18e-13354
connective tissue cell9.88e-13361
mature alpha-beta T cell4.54e-1018
alpha-beta T cell4.54e-1018
immature T cell4.54e-1018
mature T cell4.54e-1018
immature alpha-beta T cell4.54e-1018
T cell5.30e-1025
pro-T cell5.30e-1025
motile cell1.36e-09386
intermediate monocyte2.54e-099
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte2.54e-099
macrophage3.33e-076
granulocyte7.56e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system5.07e-6198
blood island5.07e-6198
hemolymphoid system2.70e-54108
bone marrow5.73e-4576
immune system2.11e-4293
bone element6.61e-4082
skeletal element3.05e-3490
skeletal system2.11e-29100
lateral plate mesoderm3.88e-18203
blood1.99e-1215
haemolymphatic fluid1.99e-1215
organism substance1.99e-1215
connective tissue5.31e-12371
musculoskeletal system2.70e-10167
adult organism5.42e-09114
mesoderm9.85e-07315
mesoderm-derived structure9.85e-07315
presumptive mesoderm9.85e-07315


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.