Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1364

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:48, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr14:56290695..56290706,-p3@Nedd8
Mm9::chr14:56290710..56290755,-p1@Nedd8
Mm9::chr17:23966062..23966110,-p1@Tceb2
Mm9::chr1:94538519..94538553,-p1@Myeov2
Mm9::chr6:124691002..124691111,-p1@Grcc10
Mm9::chr7:20158728..20158752,-p1@Gemin7


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0045116protein neddylation0.0120528132361804



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
non-terminally differentiated cell3.21e-2249
ectodermal cell8.59e-2044
neurectodermal cell8.59e-2044
embryonic cell1.04e-1970
neural cell2.91e-1943
somatic cell1.20e-17118
animal cell4.94e-16115
eukaryotic cell4.94e-16115
electrically responsive cell6.77e-1639
electrically active cell6.77e-1639
somatic stem cell1.30e-1491
multi fate stem cell1.30e-1491
neuron3.93e-1333
neuronal stem cell3.93e-1333
neuroblast3.93e-1333
electrically signaling cell3.93e-1333
stem cell7.93e-1297
CNS neuron (sensu Vertebrata)1.80e-1123
neuroblast (sensu Vertebrata)1.80e-1123
migratory neural crest cell2.71e-0710
neuron associated cell2.71e-0710
glial cell (sensu Vertebrata)2.71e-0710
neuron associated cell (sensu Vertebrata)2.71e-0710
glial cell2.71e-0710
glioblast2.71e-0710
glioblast (sensu Vertebrata)2.71e-0710


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}