Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3700

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:20, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3700_occipital_brain_temporal_duodenum_parietal_Renal_Neurons



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:79989519..79989570,+p1@RAC3
Hg19::chr17:79989572..79989600,+p2@RAC3
Hg19::chr17:79989607..79989618,+p4@RAC3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cell layer1.02e-20309
epithelium6.05e-20306
anatomical cluster5.47e-19373
multi-tissue structure4.12e-13342
ectoderm-derived structure1.41e-11171
ectoderm1.41e-11171
presumptive ectoderm1.41e-11171
unilaminar epithelium3.56e-10148
tube5.05e-10192
vasculature6.02e-1078
vascular system6.02e-1078
organ part9.43e-10218
organism subdivision1.01e-09264
epithelial vesicle1.26e-0978
mesenchyme2.07e-09160
entire embryonic mesenchyme2.07e-09160
anatomical conduit5.45e-09240
nervous system1.31e-0889
nephron epithelium5.06e-0815
renal tubule5.06e-0815
nephron tubule5.06e-0815
nephron5.06e-0815
uriniferous tubule5.06e-0815
nephrogenic mesenchyme5.06e-0815
excretory tube1.19e-0716
kidney epithelium1.19e-0716
trunk1.54e-07199
simple squamous epithelium2.49e-0722
dense mesenchyme tissue2.59e-0773
blood vessel endothelium2.77e-0718
endothelium2.77e-0718
cardiovascular system endothelium2.77e-0718
paraxial mesoderm2.93e-0772
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.93e-0772
embryo3.88e-07592
somite3.99e-0771
presomitic mesoderm3.99e-0771
presumptive segmental plate3.99e-0771
dermomyotome3.99e-0771
trunk paraxial mesoderm3.99e-0771
epithelial tube4.06e-07117
central nervous system5.45e-0781
vessel9.67e-0768


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0320391274305152
ETS1#211339.728760922202340.001085840092584840.00761714491063056
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0276451939518874
SRF#6722313.79717826216780.0003806615025800190.00374772875829135
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.014006782101696



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.