Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2617

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:45, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:100683794..100683805,-p4@Stat5b
Mm9::chr11:100683822..100683831,-p8@Stat5b
Mm9::chr11:100683839..100683890,-p2@Stat5b


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
gut epithelium2.90e-1155
gland of gut4.49e-1124
foregut1.23e-1080
endo-epithelium2.03e-1069
thymus2.13e-1023
neck2.13e-1023
respiratory system epithelium2.13e-1023
hemolymphoid system gland2.13e-1023
pharyngeal epithelium2.13e-1023
thymic region2.13e-1023
pharyngeal gland2.13e-1023
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm2.13e-1023
thymus primordium2.13e-1023
early pharyngeal endoderm2.13e-1023
gland2.93e-1065
pharynx1.10e-0924
upper respiratory tract1.10e-0924
chordate pharynx1.10e-0924
pharyngeal arch system1.10e-0924
pharyngeal region of foregut1.10e-0924
hemopoietic organ2.29e-0929
immune organ2.29e-0929
endocrine gland2.39e-0960
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure4.51e-0935
connective tissue5.42e-0946
unilaminar epithelium6.21e-0966
primordium8.03e-09134
hematopoietic system1.37e-0845
blood island1.37e-0845
hemolymphoid system2.88e-0848
immune system2.88e-0848
segment of respiratory tract6.88e-0827
exocrine gland1.12e-0725
exocrine system1.12e-0725
liver3.72e-0722
epithelial sac3.72e-0722
digestive gland3.72e-0722
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction3.72e-0722
anatomical boundary3.72e-0722
hepatobiliary system3.72e-0722
foregut-midgut junction3.72e-0722
hepatic diverticulum3.72e-0722
liver primordium3.72e-0722
septum transversum3.72e-0722
liver bud3.72e-0722
respiratory system3.95e-0742
lateral plate mesoderm9.66e-0787


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}