Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1576

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:27, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1576_Mast_CD4_Natural_CD19_Basophils_CD8_CD34



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:32621291..32621298,-p@chr10:32621291..32621298
-
Hg19::chr14:50329808..50329834,+p@chr14:50329808..50329834
+
Hg19::chr1:144520117..144520134,+p@chr1:144520117..144520134
+
Hg19::chr4:40198691..40198704,+p2@RHOH
Hg19::chr5:109026781..109026805,-p@chr5:109026781..109026805
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte7.08e-51136
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell8.35e-4752
lymphocyte1.40e-4553
common lymphoid progenitor1.40e-4553
nucleate cell3.22e-4555
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.13e-44120
nongranular leukocyte8.33e-43115
hematopoietic stem cell2.40e-40168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.40e-40168
hematopoietic cell5.82e-39177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.54e-35161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.54e-35161
lymphocyte of B lineage1.28e-2324
pro-B cell1.28e-2324
mature alpha-beta T cell5.63e-2318
alpha-beta T cell5.63e-2318
immature T cell5.63e-2318
mature T cell5.63e-2318
immature alpha-beta T cell5.63e-2318
T cell4.62e-2025
pro-T cell4.62e-2025
B cell3.00e-1714
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.84e-1411
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.31e-096
myeloid leukocyte7.59e-0972
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.15e-0766
classical monocyte1.33e-0742
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.33e-0742
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.72e-0767
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system4.78e-1598
blood island4.78e-1598
hemolymphoid system6.67e-14108
immune system9.62e-0993
blood2.72e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid2.72e-0815
organism substance2.72e-0815
bone marrow5.88e-0776


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BCL11A#53335211.34778204144280.01157056933741320.0422819695951748
BCL3#602320.7282616822430.0002320005217689230.00254997921416802
BDP1#558141210.0306818181820.00475220144180810.0223354109347462
BRF2#552901214.915116279070.004644397888135530.0219244382136588
EBF1#187935.34388010794140.01187615563868110.0432262430734028
GATA2#262437.64695904013240.004279061879252130.0203256898898082
NFKB1#479044.390450739355070.004707732692524960.0221943255845535
TAF1#687253.343046285745290.002394600090870310.0135095958778308



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.