Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3524

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:59, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3524_adrenal_trachea_skeletal_diaphragm_stomach_aorta_throat



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr15:84322458..84322470,+p2@ADAMTSL3
Hg19::chr15:84322827..84322861,+p3@ADAMTSL3
Hg19::chr15:84322865..84322888,+p1@ADAMTSL3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.41e-48115
neural plate1.38e-2786
presumptive neural plate1.38e-2786
neurectoderm5.28e-2790
neural tube1.33e-2657
neural rod1.33e-2657
future spinal cord1.33e-2657
neural keel1.33e-2657
regional part of nervous system2.24e-2694
nervous system2.24e-2694
central nervous system7.76e-2482
regional part of brain9.49e-2259
anterior neural tube3.39e-2142
regional part of forebrain1.53e-2041
forebrain1.53e-2041
future forebrain1.53e-2041
brain3.35e-2069
future brain3.35e-2069
pre-chordal neural plate1.35e-1861
telencephalon3.82e-1734
gray matter5.34e-1734
brain grey matter5.34e-1734
regional part of telencephalon1.13e-1633
cerebral hemisphere6.51e-1632
anterior region of body1.86e-14129
craniocervical region1.86e-14129
ectoderm1.97e-14173
presumptive ectoderm1.97e-14173
ectoderm-derived structure2.02e-14169
head1.38e-13123
cerebral cortex4.18e-1325
pallium4.18e-1325
anatomical conduit8.72e-12241
anatomical cluster2.12e-11286
regional part of cerebral cortex4.13e-1122
tube9.26e-11194
neocortex2.61e-1020
multi-cellular organism2.82e-10659
multi-tissue structure1.60e-09347
organ2.56e-09511
organism subdivision9.07e-09365
epithelium5.05e-08309
organ part5.30e-08219
embryo8.74e-08612
cell layer1.25e-07312
anatomical system2.74e-07625
anatomical group3.53e-07626


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0324635139118418
STAT3#6774310.51946499715420.0008589184530415310.00642168976427836



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.