Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3826

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:26, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3826_temporal_cerebellum_brain_occipital_optic_duodenum_parietal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr19:57183114..57183145,-p1@ZNF835
Hg19::chr19:58446721..58446779,-p1@ZNF418
Hg19::chr19:58514229..58514279,+p1@LOC100128398


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.07e-41114
neural tube8.20e-3356
neural rod8.20e-3356
future spinal cord8.20e-3356
neural keel8.20e-3356
nervous system1.12e-3289
central nervous system7.70e-3281
regional part of nervous system5.66e-3153
regional part of brain5.66e-3153
neurectoderm3.37e-2786
neural plate4.06e-2682
presumptive neural plate4.06e-2682
brain1.31e-2568
future brain1.31e-2568
regional part of forebrain1.80e-2541
forebrain1.80e-2541
anterior neural tube1.80e-2541
future forebrain1.80e-2541
ectoderm-derived structure3.28e-22171
ectoderm3.28e-22171
presumptive ectoderm3.28e-22171
brain grey matter3.10e-2134
gray matter3.10e-2134
telencephalon3.22e-2134
regional part of telencephalon4.82e-2032
cerebral hemisphere7.10e-2032
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest8.89e-20132
pre-chordal neural plate1.63e-1961
ecto-epithelium6.36e-19104
cerebral cortex9.62e-1625
pallium9.62e-1625
regional part of cerebral cortex7.71e-1522
neocortex9.77e-1420
organ system subdivision2.85e-09223
posterior neural tube1.82e-0815
chordal neural plate1.82e-0815
segmental subdivision of nervous system1.97e-0713
neural nucleus5.89e-079
nucleus of brain5.89e-079
basal ganglion6.33e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis6.33e-079
aggregate regional part of brain6.33e-079
collection of basal ganglia6.33e-079
cerebral subcortex6.33e-079
segmental subdivision of hindbrain8.98e-0712
hindbrain8.98e-0712
presumptive hindbrain8.98e-0712


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
SIX5#147912211.3911435703060.009873820081429030.0370752820696184
ZNF143#7702313.50087655222790.0004062804962997170.00389101593333756



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.