Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1117

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:41, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1117_CD19_Eosinophils_Dendritic_Neutrophils_Basophils_CD14_CD34



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:43932296..43932360,+p1@ZNF487P
Hg19::chr22:50629895..50629908,-p@chr22:50629895..50629908
-
Hg19::chr22:50630977..50630984,-p@chr22:50630977..50630984
-
Hg19::chr22:50639164..50639182,-p@chr22:50639164..50639182
-
Hg19::chr2:64880894..64880977,-p2@SERTAD2
Hg19::chr3:135914798..135914850,+p@chr3:135914798..135914850
+
Hg19::chr5:40681669..40681698,+p4@PTGER4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0004957prostaglandin E receptor activity0.0254229767174927
GO:0030278regulation of ossification0.0254229767174927
GO:0004955prostaglandin receptor activity0.0254229767174927
GO:0046850regulation of bone remodeling0.0254229767174927
GO:0004953icosanoid receptor activity0.0254229767174927
GO:0004954prostanoid receptor activity0.0254229767174927
GO:0030308negative regulation of cell growth0.0344450048876544
GO:0045792negative regulation of cell size0.0344450048876544
GO:0048856anatomical structure development0.0344450048876544
GO:0045926negative regulation of growth0.0344450048876544
GO:0007188G-protein signaling, coupled to cAMP nucleotide second messenger0.0354795642737389
GO:0019933cAMP-mediated signaling0.0354795642737389
GO:0031214biomineral formation0.0354795642737389
GO:0001503ossification0.0354795642737389
GO:0046849bone remodeling0.0361203882202558
GO:0048771tissue remodeling0.0370325943749413
GO:0007187G-protein signaling, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messenger0.0382378355329935
GO:0019935cyclic-nucleotide-mediated signaling0.0382378355329935
GO:0001558regulation of cell growth0.0465793516965004
GO:0032502developmental process0.0465793516965004
GO:0003713transcription coactivator activity0.0471036744921992
GO:0016049cell growth0.0471036744921992
GO:0040008regulation of growth0.0471036744921992
GO:0008361regulation of cell size0.0471036744921992
GO:0001501skeletal development0.0471036744921992
GO:0045893positive regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent0.0483159197004316



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte8.22e-85136
hematopoietic stem cell1.24e-75168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.24e-75168
hematopoietic cell2.98e-72177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.88e-69161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.88e-69161
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.62e-66120
nongranular leukocyte1.17e-65115
myeloid leukocyte1.88e-4372
classical monocyte4.57e-3842
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.57e-3842
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.84e-3767
myeloid cell2.21e-37108
common myeloid progenitor2.21e-37108
defensive cell1.20e-3648
phagocyte1.20e-3648
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.28e-3361
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell7.40e-3366
monopoietic cell9.54e-3259
monocyte9.54e-3259
monoblast9.54e-3259
promonocyte9.54e-3259
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.95e-2952
lymphocyte2.10e-2853
common lymphoid progenitor2.10e-2853
nucleate cell8.54e-2755
mesenchymal cell1.94e-18354
connective tissue cell2.30e-17361
stuff accumulating cell9.74e-1587
B cell2.17e-1414
T cell4.54e-1425
pro-T cell4.54e-1425
motile cell1.17e-13386
mature alpha-beta T cell1.80e-1318
alpha-beta T cell1.80e-1318
immature T cell1.80e-1318
mature T cell1.80e-1318
immature alpha-beta T cell1.80e-1318
lymphocyte of B lineage4.12e-1324
pro-B cell4.12e-1324
intermediate monocyte1.13e-119
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte1.13e-119
granulocyte6.00e-118
stem cell3.91e-10441
multi fate stem cell4.85e-10427
somatic stem cell1.88e-09433
blood cell6.85e-0911
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.57e-0811
dendritic cell1.75e-0810
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell7.42e-086
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system3.55e-4298
blood island3.55e-4298
hemolymphoid system4.48e-38108
bone marrow2.68e-3276
immune system3.17e-2993
bone element1.75e-2882
skeletal element3.17e-2490
skeletal system7.93e-21100
connective tissue6.49e-16371
lateral plate mesoderm5.78e-13203
blood6.47e-1015
haemolymphatic fluid6.47e-1015
organism substance6.47e-1015


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ELF1#199753.041498542005380.009719562269370750.036557833538042
PBX3#509039.391934008604630.002893813688341480.015644839413847



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.