Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2691

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:39, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2691_migratory_CD14_splenic_myelodysplastic_immature_acute_Dendritic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:232047395..232047400,-p@chr2:232047395..232047400
-
Hg19::chr2:232047415..232047450,-p@chr2:232047415..232047450
-
Hg19::chr2:232047454..232047457,-p@chr2:232047454..232047457
-
Hg19::chr9:134610968..134610980,-p@chr9:134610968..134610980
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.19e-6761
monopoietic cell1.33e-6259
monocyte1.33e-6259
monoblast1.33e-6259
promonocyte1.33e-6259
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.05e-6067
defensive cell8.48e-6048
phagocyte8.48e-6048
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell5.94e-5566
myeloid cell1.29e-54108
common myeloid progenitor1.29e-54108
classical monocyte3.77e-5342
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte3.77e-5342
myeloid leukocyte1.96e-5272
leukocyte2.38e-40136
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell3.25e-39161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell3.25e-39161
hematopoietic stem cell9.80e-39168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell9.80e-39168
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.92e-36120
nongranular leukocyte3.13e-36115
hematopoietic cell4.24e-36177
stuff accumulating cell7.99e-2987
conventional dendritic cell1.96e-218
dendritic cell3.00e-1710
Langerhans cell3.16e-165
mesenchymal cell5.71e-13354
immature conventional dendritic cell8.81e-135
common dendritic progenitor8.81e-135
connective tissue cell1.84e-12361
motile cell1.11e-10386
multi fate stem cell4.05e-09427
somatic stem cell8.24e-09433
stem cell2.05e-08441
macrophage7.53e-086
CD1a-positive Langerhans cell2.70e-072
immature CD1a-positive Langerhans cell2.70e-072
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow2.55e-5276
bone element9.66e-4882
immune system1.25e-4593
hematopoietic system7.71e-4398
blood island7.71e-4398
skeletal element1.40e-4290
hemolymphoid system7.68e-40108
skeletal system2.78e-37100
musculoskeletal system2.51e-19167
lateral plate mesoderm4.13e-15203
connective tissue1.63e-12371
mesoderm2.89e-07315
mesoderm-derived structure2.89e-07315
presumptive mesoderm2.89e-07315


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
FOS#235348.99795530889440.0001525147711168630.00195106445133195
MAX#414934.839416631755340.01315737137836840.0466380229902733
NFYA#4800313.81918552487290.0006132411806734510.00508909778850652
NFYB#4801312.56984494015230.000811456397697350.00619138623020993
USF1#739146.361499277207960.0006105011399140830.00508494525492359
USF2#739239.74414803880220.001718341848410070.010723746896092



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.