Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1090

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:07, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1090_teratocarcinoma_Fibroblast_glioblastoma_kidney_H9_iPS_Amniotic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:131186252..131186269,-p@chr7:131186252..131186269
-
Hg19::chr7:131194150..131194174,+p@chr7:131194150..131194174
+
Hg19::chr7:131195751..131195762,+p@chr7:131195751..131195762
+
Hg19::chr7:131195804..131195897,+p@chr7:131195804..131195897
+
Hg19::chr7:131195908..131195945,+p@chr7:131195908..131195945
+
Hg19::chr7:131196091..131196119,+p@chr7:131196091..131196119
+
Hg19::chr7:131196120..131196161,+p@chr7:131196120..131196161
+
Hg19::chr7:131241361..131241398,-p1@PODXL


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.08e-17115
regional part of nervous system4.74e-1794
nervous system4.74e-1794
central nervous system6.42e-1782
tube7.16e-17194
multi-cellular organism1.84e-16659
anatomical conduit7.16e-16241
anatomical cluster2.75e-15286
anatomical group4.09e-15626
neural tube4.28e-1557
neural rod4.28e-1557
future spinal cord4.28e-1557
neural keel4.28e-1557
anatomical system6.33e-15625
brain4.93e-1469
future brain4.93e-1469
neural plate6.27e-1386
presumptive neural plate6.27e-1386
regional part of brain1.31e-1259
anterior neural tube1.48e-1242
regional part of forebrain1.98e-1241
forebrain1.98e-1241
future forebrain1.98e-1241
neurectoderm1.06e-1190
gray matter1.71e-1134
brain grey matter1.71e-1134
telencephalon4.04e-1134
cell layer6.36e-11312
regional part of telencephalon7.27e-1133
epithelium8.52e-11309
cerebral hemisphere1.62e-1032
organ part3.96e-10219
endothelium5.86e-0918
blood vessel endothelium5.86e-0918
cardiovascular system endothelium5.86e-0918
pre-chordal neural plate1.37e-0861
cerebral cortex1.49e-0825
pallium1.49e-0825
embryo3.35e-08612
vessel4.25e-0869
organ8.62e-08511
ectoderm-derived structure1.26e-07169
regional part of cerebral cortex2.94e-0722
organism subdivision3.35e-07365
ectoderm4.50e-07173
presumptive ectoderm4.50e-07173


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.