Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2870

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:29, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2870_Smooth_leiomyoma_giant_Synoviocyte_Urothelial_Myoblast_mesenchymal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:86159765..86159820,+p1@NT5E
Hg19::chr6:86159821..86159839,+p2@NT5E
Hg19::chr6:86159843..86159854,+p4@NT5E
Hg19::chr6:86203923..86203945,+p@chr6:86203923..86203945
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
somite1.32e-2283
paraxial mesoderm1.32e-2283
presomitic mesoderm1.32e-2283
presumptive segmental plate1.32e-2283
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.32e-2283
presumptive paraxial mesoderm1.32e-2283
trunk mesenchyme1.50e-21143
multilaminar epithelium4.15e-2182
vasculature4.14e-1879
vascular system4.14e-1879
organism subdivision5.70e-18365
dermomyotome1.22e-1770
trunk9.96e-17216
cell layer3.84e-16312
vessel1.05e-1569
epithelium2.30e-15309
blood vessel3.83e-1560
epithelial tube open at both ends3.83e-1560
blood vasculature3.83e-1560
vascular cord3.83e-1560
artery4.05e-1542
arterial blood vessel4.05e-1542
arterial system4.05e-1542
epithelial tube9.34e-15118
unilaminar epithelium1.11e-14138
multi-tissue structure3.95e-14347
surface structure5.29e-1495
skeletal muscle tissue6.16e-1461
striated muscle tissue6.16e-1461
myotome6.16e-1461
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm9.51e-1484
muscle tissue1.18e-1363
musculature1.18e-1363
musculature of body1.18e-1363
anatomical system1.92e-13625
anatomical group3.00e-13626
systemic artery6.92e-1333
systemic arterial system6.92e-1333
multi-cellular organism1.08e-12659
anatomical cluster1.33e-12286
mesenchyme1.74e-12238
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.74e-12238
cardiovascular system6.92e-12110
circulatory system5.40e-11113
anatomical conduit6.58e-10241
integument1.68e-0845
integumental system1.68e-0845
germ layer3.45e-08604
embryonic tissue3.45e-08604
presumptive structure3.45e-08604
epiblast (generic)3.45e-08604
embryonic structure3.96e-08605
developing anatomical structure3.96e-08605
skin of body8.01e-0840
aorta2.30e-0721
aortic system2.30e-0721
embryo3.30e-07612
female organism7.23e-0741


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.