Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2382

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:22, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr3:84063538..84063555,-p8@Trim2
Mm9::chr3:84063580..84063621,-p3@Trim2
Mm9::chr3:84063622..84063650,-p5@Trim2
Mm9::chr3:84063658..84063709,-p2@Trim2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
ectoderm-derived structure1.65e-2195
ectoderm1.65e-2195
presumptive ectoderm1.65e-2195
nervous system5.24e-1875
central nervous system9.17e-1873
ecto-epithelium1.36e-1773
regional part of nervous system6.47e-1554
neurectoderm7.12e-1564
neural plate7.12e-1564
presumptive neural plate7.12e-1564
gray matter9.37e-1534
neural tube8.11e-1452
neural rod8.11e-1452
future spinal cord8.11e-1452
neural keel8.11e-1452
brain grey matter9.96e-1329
regional part of telencephalon9.96e-1329
telencephalon9.96e-1329
brain9.72e-1247
future brain9.72e-1247
regional part of brain3.29e-1146
pre-chordal neural plate9.82e-1149
cerebral cortex2.14e-1021
cerebral hemisphere2.14e-1021
pallium2.14e-1021
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.94e-1092
anterior neural tube4.12e-1040
regional part of forebrain1.50e-0939
forebrain1.50e-0939
future forebrain1.50e-0939
anatomical conduit1.57e-09122
regional part of cerebral cortex2.68e-0817
tube4.99e-08114
anatomical cluster2.45e-07244
adult organism2.95e-0751
occipital lobe4.27e-0710
visual cortex4.27e-0710
neocortex4.27e-0710


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}