Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2242

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:23, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2242_Mammary_Keratinocyte_Trabecular_Nucleus_salivary_Prostate_Skeletal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:76424402..76424485,+p@chr12:76424402..76424485
+
Hg19::chr12:76424486..76424575,+p@chr12:76424486..76424575
+
Hg19::chr12:76424595..76424611,+p@chr12:76424595..76424611
+
Hg19::chr12:76424717..76424755,+p@chr12:76424717..76424755
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anatomical system1.18e-18624
anatomical group2.77e-18625
multi-cellular organism3.59e-17656
embryo9.58e-17592
developing anatomical structure9.95e-16581
cell layer1.27e-14309
epithelium2.85e-14306
embryonic structure4.27e-14564
germ layer1.73e-13560
germ layer / neural crest1.73e-13560
embryonic tissue1.73e-13560
presumptive structure1.73e-13560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure1.73e-13560
epiblast (generic)1.73e-13560
organism subdivision7.14e-13264
multi-tissue structure4.50e-12342
anatomical cluster5.92e-12373
surface structure2.31e-1099
multilaminar epithelium2.59e-1083
epithelial tube7.59e-10117
anatomical conduit2.30e-09240
head2.63e-0956
unilaminar epithelium2.86e-09148
artery1.63e-0842
arterial blood vessel1.63e-0842
arterial system1.63e-0842
epithelial vesicle2.07e-0878
vasculature2.49e-0878
vascular system2.49e-0878
subdivision of head2.91e-0849
mesenchyme6.23e-08160
entire embryonic mesenchyme6.23e-08160
organ7.02e-08503
dense mesenchyme tissue7.90e-0873
somite1.02e-0771
presomitic mesoderm1.02e-0771
presumptive segmental plate1.02e-0771
dermomyotome1.02e-0771
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.02e-0771
paraxial mesoderm1.20e-0772
presumptive paraxial mesoderm1.20e-0772
anterior region of body1.48e-0762
craniocervical region1.48e-0762
systemic artery1.64e-0733
systemic arterial system1.64e-0733
trunk mesenchyme1.80e-07122
trunk6.72e-07199


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EBF1#187936.679850134926750.005184294118278910.0240406044498238
SMARCB1#6598313.68953683586810.0006305783409379340.00518028564062116
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.0321516491580658



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.