Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1900

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:10, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1900_Mast_cord_immature_CD14_CD34_chronic_CD4



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:25432921..25432925,-p@chr2:25432921..25432925
-
Hg19::chr2:74758077..74758089,-p@chr2:74758077..74758089
-
Hg19::chr7:37393263..37393284,-p11@ELMO1
Hg19::chr7:37393479..37393526,+p@chr7:37393479..37393526
+
Hg19::chr7:642229..642251,-p@chr7:642229..642251
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic cell1.21e-38177
hematopoietic stem cell7.45e-36168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell7.45e-36168
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell6.42e-33161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell6.42e-33161
leukocyte4.06e-32136
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.43e-2752
lymphocyte1.08e-2653
common lymphoid progenitor1.08e-2653
nucleate cell1.82e-2555
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.18e-25120
nongranular leukocyte4.32e-20115
T cell8.62e-1625
pro-T cell8.62e-1625
mature alpha-beta T cell2.84e-1318
alpha-beta T cell2.84e-1318
immature T cell2.84e-1318
mature T cell2.84e-1318
immature alpha-beta T cell2.84e-1318
circulating cell2.70e-126
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.32e-116
conventional dendritic cell5.27e-118
myeloid cell1.28e-10108
common myeloid progenitor1.28e-10108
mesenchymal cell4.14e-10354
histamine secreting cell4.81e-105
biogenic amine secreting cell4.81e-105
granulocytopoietic cell4.81e-105
mast cell4.81e-105
mast cell progenitor4.81e-105
basophil mast progenitor cell4.81e-105
Langerhans cell4.92e-105
natural killer cell7.11e-103
pro-NK cell7.11e-103
connective tissue cell1.14e-09361
basophil3.07e-093
naive T cell3.63e-093
dendritic cell7.29e-0910
motile cell3.94e-08386
lymphocyte of B lineage5.64e-0824
pro-B cell5.64e-0824
immature conventional dendritic cell8.04e-085
common dendritic progenitor8.04e-085
CD1a-positive Langerhans cell2.15e-072
immature CD1a-positive Langerhans cell2.15e-072
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.90e-1298
blood island1.90e-1298
hemolymphoid system1.09e-11108
connective tissue4.52e-09371
blood8.69e-0915
haemolymphatic fluid8.69e-0915
organism substance8.69e-0915
immune system8.87e-0793


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EBF1#187935.34388010794140.01187615563868110.043241312883427
EGR1#195843.990543275848110.0067800983001440.0287719591389516
GATA1#2623410.84824651504040.0001390956917094380.00181587686830525



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.