Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1111

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1111_CD8_Natural_CD14_Basophils_CD4_Peripheral_immature



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:17069064..17069080,+p@chr10:17069064..17069080
+
Hg19::chr11:58341472..58341486,+p@chr11:58341472..58341486
+
Hg19::chr12:92271876..92271896,+p@chr12:92271876..92271896
+
Hg19::chr12:92271935..92271946,+p@chr12:92271935..92271946
+
Hg19::chr1:234747186..234747197,+p@chr1:234747186..234747197
+
Hg19::chr5:42994725..42994739,-p@chr5:42994725..42994739
-
Hg19::chr5:43042044..43042056,-p@chr5:43042044..43042056
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte2.92e-67136
classical monocyte1.27e-6142
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.27e-6142
nongranular leukocyte3.80e-54115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.61e-53120
hematopoietic cell2.68e-53177
defensive cell1.17e-5248
phagocyte1.17e-5248
hematopoietic stem cell2.10e-51168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.10e-51168
myeloid leukocyte5.79e-5172
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.35e-4667
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell8.06e-45161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell8.06e-45161
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell8.20e-4566
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor8.34e-4461
monopoietic cell6.86e-4359
monocyte6.86e-4359
monoblast6.86e-4359
promonocyte6.86e-4359
myeloid cell1.25e-33108
common myeloid progenitor1.25e-33108
stuff accumulating cell1.20e-2487
mesenchymal cell6.45e-16354
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell9.34e-166
connective tissue cell2.68e-15361
circulating cell4.75e-146
motile cell3.96e-13386
mature alpha-beta T cell6.46e-1318
alpha-beta T cell6.46e-1318
immature T cell6.46e-1318
mature T cell6.46e-1318
immature alpha-beta T cell6.46e-1318
stem cell1.33e-11441
multi fate stem cell4.31e-11427
somatic stem cell1.02e-10433
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.94e-1052
lymphocyte3.69e-1053
common lymphoid progenitor3.69e-1053
nucleate cell1.23e-0955
natural killer cell1.44e-093
pro-NK cell1.44e-093
basophil3.71e-093
T cell1.12e-0825
pro-T cell1.12e-0825
naive T cell1.48e-083
single nucleate cell3.02e-083
mononuclear cell3.02e-083
plasmacytoid dendritic cell4.07e-083
intermediate monocyte3.66e-079
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte3.66e-079
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system4.05e-4298
blood island4.05e-4298
bone marrow7.72e-4076
hemolymphoid system4.38e-37108
bone element3.74e-3682
immune system1.18e-3293
skeletal element5.28e-3290
skeletal system9.44e-28100
connective tissue1.86e-14371
lateral plate mesoderm3.96e-14203
musculoskeletal system2.20e-13167


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0462779
MA0004.10.502801
MA0006.10.341337
MA0007.10.483857
MA0009.10.973289
MA0014.10.0723474
MA0017.10.380797
MA0019.10.652951
MA0024.12.01466
MA0025.11.10816
MA0027.12.59001
MA0028.10.35747
MA0029.10.886702
MA0030.10.875089
MA0031.10.809638
MA0038.10.60704
MA0040.10.892629
MA0041.10.521615
MA0042.10.48922
MA0043.10.973609
MA0046.10.962263
MA0048.10.120314
MA0050.10.490116
MA0051.10.602745
MA0052.10.896548
MA0055.10.158296
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.115382
MA0058.10.406232
MA0059.10.404929
MA0060.10.224688
MA0061.11.71672
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.607474
MA0067.11.29359
MA0068.10.162298
MA0069.10.958358
MA0070.10.947018
MA0071.10.567661
MA0072.10.942461
MA0073.10.488614
MA0074.10.60198
MA0076.10.422297
MA0077.10.934645
MA0078.10.703614
MA0081.10.405093
MA0083.10.980893
MA0084.11.48179
MA0087.10.939982
MA0088.10.538456
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.436918
MA0091.10.505453
MA0092.10.467172
MA0093.10.344385
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.621149
MA0101.12.48383
MA0103.10.332048
MA0105.10.104569
MA0106.10.648997
MA0107.12.1191
MA0108.20.806528
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.45062
MA0113.10.665691
MA0114.10.269076
MA0115.11.21667
MA0116.10.277571
MA0117.11.01134
MA0119.10.388712
MA0122.11.03753
MA0124.11.17486
MA0125.11.0901
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.722072
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.00402
MA0136.10.614215
MA0139.10.186511
MA0140.10.564957
MA0141.10.403171
MA0142.10.777365
MA0143.10.66587
MA0144.10.254954
MA0145.10.0807715
MA0146.10.324987
MA0147.10.768766
MA0148.10.528066
MA0149.10.555119
MA0062.20.193221
MA0035.20.564239
MA0039.20.243958
MA0138.20.704862
MA0002.20.213296
MA0137.20.36398
MA0104.20.223944
MA0047.20.636643
MA0112.20.0758925
MA0065.20.0828768
MA0150.10.430951
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.571637
MA0153.11.07307
MA0154.10.102476
MA0155.10.071478
MA0156.10.959643
MA0157.10.749547
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.281681
MA0160.10.543522
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.25944
MA0163.10.0765396
MA0164.11.62495
MA0080.20.344472
MA0018.20.650405
MA0099.20.572
MA0079.20.122495
MA0102.21.51913
MA0258.10.245543
MA0259.10.289405
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
SUZ12#23512214.3187945460180.007819681923614860.0321173415298259



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.