Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3203


Revision as of 05:33, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Full id: C3203_testicular_Mast_H9_Eosinophils_iPS_immature_gall

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr11:77184963..77185028,- p2@PAK1
Hg19::chr11:77185029..77185043,- p9@PAK1
Hg19::chr11:77185057..77185070,- p13@PAK1

Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neural cell4.80e-0825
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system2.28e-2194
nervous system2.28e-2194
central nervous system4.33e-2182
neural plate7.67e-1786
presumptive neural plate7.67e-1786
future brain1.22e-1669
neural tube1.46e-1657
neural rod1.46e-1657
future spinal cord1.46e-1657
neural keel1.46e-1657
presumptive ectoderm2.19e-15173
ectoderm-derived structure3.97e-15169
regional part of brain2.98e-1459
anterior region of body3.11e-14129
craniocervical region3.11e-14129
pre-chordal neural plate5.19e-1461
cerebral hemisphere1.39e-1232
regional part of forebrain1.51e-1241
future forebrain1.51e-1241
anterior neural tube2.30e-1242
gray matter2.47e-1234
brain grey matter2.47e-1234
regional part of telencephalon2.68e-1233
cerebral cortex1.71e-1125
adult organism1.47e-10115
regional part of cerebral cortex1.97e-1022
embryonic structure1.20e-09605
developing anatomical structure1.20e-09605
germ layer1.29e-09604
embryonic tissue1.29e-09604
presumptive structure1.29e-09604
epiblast (generic)1.29e-09604
organ part3.50e-09219
Ontology termp-valuen
cell type cancer1.99e-08143

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs

Jaspar motifs

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.

link to data source

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.