Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4510: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|full_id=C4510_bone_mesenchymal_Small_squamous_Fibroblast_thyroid_glioblastoma
 

Latest revision as of 14:14, 17 September 2013


Full id: C4510_bone_mesenchymal_Small_squamous_Fibroblast_thyroid_glioblastoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:60600415..60600431,-p@chr5:60600415..60600431
-
Hg19::chr5:60600469..60600488,-p@chr5:60600469..60600488
-
Hg19::chr5:60600512..60600563,-p@chr5:60600512..60600563
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
artery4.13e-1642
arterial blood vessel4.13e-1642
arterial system4.13e-1642
endoderm-derived structure3.92e-15160
endoderm3.92e-15160
presumptive endoderm3.92e-15160
unilaminar epithelium8.62e-15148
systemic artery1.36e-1433
systemic arterial system1.36e-1433
organism subdivision1.51e-13264
multilaminar epithelium1.16e-1283
skeletal muscle tissue1.57e-1262
striated muscle tissue1.57e-1262
myotome1.57e-1262
multi-tissue structure1.99e-12342
trunk mesenchyme2.22e-12122
digestive system6.64e-12145
digestive tract6.64e-12145
primitive gut6.64e-12145
somite1.00e-1171
presomitic mesoderm1.00e-1171
presumptive segmental plate1.00e-1171
dermomyotome1.00e-1171
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.00e-1171
dense mesenchyme tissue1.01e-1173
muscle tissue1.13e-1164
musculature1.13e-1164
musculature of body1.13e-1164
paraxial mesoderm2.40e-1172
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.40e-1172
aorta1.90e-1021
aortic system1.90e-1021
trunk1.99e-10199
epithelial tube open at both ends4.18e-1059
blood vessel4.18e-1059
blood vasculature4.18e-1059
vascular cord4.18e-1059
endo-epithelium9.44e-1082
respiratory system1.66e-0974
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.99e-0983
anatomical conduit2.43e-09240
epithelial vesicle2.54e-0978
epithelium1.43e-08306
cell layer1.93e-08309
blood vessel smooth muscle2.41e-0810
arterial system smooth muscle2.41e-0810
artery smooth muscle tissue2.41e-0810
aorta smooth muscle tissue2.41e-0810
thoracic cavity element3.43e-0834
thoracic cavity3.43e-0834
mucosa5.95e-0820
surface structure6.05e-0899
anatomical cluster6.56e-08373
orifice6.84e-0836
thoracic segment organ9.98e-0835
mouth1.05e-0729
stomodeum1.05e-0729
mesenchyme1.22e-07160
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.22e-07160
mouth mucosa3.46e-0713
vessel3.64e-0768
epithelial tube3.74e-07117
reproductive structure5.49e-0759
reproductive system5.49e-0759
tracheobronchial tree7.60e-0715
lower respiratory tract7.60e-0715
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
squamous cell carcinoma8.78e-0914


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0471418
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.118426
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.904546
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.557638
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.0185922
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.12.37746
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.12.03569
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.11.35563
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.11.12079
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.11.31729
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.107247
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.432958
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.22.88736
MA0065.20.760954
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.149099
MA0163.10.122425
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.0107199
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.12.22591
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BRCA1#672320.18423064322380.0001215704860271640.00164465025779676
CEBPB#105137.971147625824820.001974187055288560.0115644243573549
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0280949315868959
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0168168877039914
ESR1#2099330.76860329615453.43136389821584e-050.00067872767834425
GTF2F1#2962312.73966087675770.0004835525047438590.00435585130610177
JUN#3725312.51282919233630.0005103313992726250.00445975240637885
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0157466625944682
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.0187259350099651
MXI1#460139.96157162875930.001011470541259020.00722600532584657
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0295724904620184
NR3C1#2908314.9730233311730.0002978331194675480.00309876401315713
RFX5#5993312.04791082719510.0005717246050312580.004862802021733
SMARCB1#6598318.25271578115740.000164397760679890.00203816924592201
SMC3#9126315.04493284493280.0002935825420371870.00310464430010346
STAT3#6774310.51946499715420.0008589184530415310.00644939135216079
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.00249246008686632
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00618273458180723



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.