Coexpression cluster:C4066

Full id: C4066_uterus_cervix_seminal_medulloblastoma_Skeletal_ductus_epitheloid

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr21:17566504..17566519,+	p15@LINC00478
Hg19::chr21:17566590..17566632,+	p4@LINC00478
Hg19::chr21:17566643..17566671,+	p9@LINC00478

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
non-terminally differentiated cell	4.88e-07	180

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
central nervous system	4.13e-14	82
adult organism	2.82e-13	115
multi-cellular organism	4.39e-13	659
head	1.23e-12	123
anterior region of body	1.49e-12	129
craniocervical region	1.49e-12	129
brain	1.91e-12	69
future brain	1.91e-12	69
regional part of brain	1.96e-12	59
neural tube	9.38e-12	57
neural rod	9.38e-12	57
future spinal cord	9.38e-12	57
neural keel	9.38e-12	57
regional part of nervous system	1.26e-11	94
nervous system	1.26e-11	94
anatomical system	1.64e-11	625
anatomical group	1.78e-11	626
neural plate	4.68e-11	86
presumptive neural plate	4.68e-11	86
tissue	1.05e-10	787
organ	4.97e-10	511
neurectoderm	5.08e-10	90
organism subdivision	8.08e-10	365
anterior neural tube	2.39e-09	42
ectoderm-derived structure	4.27e-09	169
regional part of forebrain	4.53e-09	41
forebrain	4.53e-09	41
future forebrain	4.53e-09	41
embryo	5.75e-09	612
embryonic structure	7.89e-09	605
developing anatomical structure	7.89e-09	605
multi-tissue structure	1.24e-08	347
ectoderm	1.66e-08	173
presumptive ectoderm	1.66e-08	173
germ layer	1.71e-08	604
embryonic tissue	1.71e-08	604
presumptive structure	1.71e-08	604
epiblast (generic)	1.71e-08	604
pre-chordal neural plate	3.67e-08	61
gray matter	5.65e-07	34
brain grey matter	5.65e-07	34
regional part of telencephalon	5.71e-07	33
telencephalon	6.99e-07	34

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
CEBPB#1051	3	7.97114762582482	0.00197418705528856	0.0115385372358432
ESR1#2099	3	30.7686032961545	3.43136389821584e-05	0.000677316602089896
TFAP2A#7020	3	16.518634373045	0.000221803388076634	0.00248550687203171
TFAP2C#7022	3	10.8092286098602	0.000791674657575313	0.00616613539879992
TRIM28#10155	3	18.5905250452625	0.000155596929725528	0.00197261322452104
YY1#7528	3	4.91117074985386	0.00844145534180826	0.0329872466677809

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.