Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1474

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:55, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1474_Mast_CD34_immature_CD14_CD133_pleomorphic_granulocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:28764653..28764670,+p2@PHACTR4
Hg19::chr3:15839437..15839503,-p1@ANKRD28
Hg19::chr3:15839515..15839526,-p11@ANKRD28
Hg19::chr3:15839528..15839539,-p14@ANKRD28
Hg19::chr3:15839573..15839583,-p15@ANKRD28
Hg19::chr3:15839586..15839603,-p7@ANKRD28


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0004864protein phosphatase inhibitor activity0.0164759143109795
GO:0019212phosphatase inhibitor activity0.0164759143109795
GO:0019888protein phosphatase regulator activity0.0192869987391987
GO:0019208phosphatase regulator activity0.0192869987391987



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
connective tissue1.62e-17371
skeletal system3.38e-17100
skeletal element3.43e-1690
bone element6.26e-1682
bone marrow8.29e-1676
immune system3.10e-1493
hematopoietic system7.72e-1498
blood island7.72e-1498
hemolymphoid system3.18e-13108
musculoskeletal system7.96e-12167
mesoderm1.66e-07315
mesoderm-derived structure1.66e-07315
presumptive mesoderm1.66e-07315


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066454.466880310895860.001144848346172360.0078358225588764
EP300#203366.77394172622321.03454107484288e-050.000269778864707904
FOS#235368.99795530889441.88302066097805e-066.9442371049395e-05
FOXA1#3169611.08141974938555.39600313513231e-072.50579444833296e-05
FOXA2#3170520.52538646055446.3869668268396e-072.91287523331135e-05
HEY1#2346264.040111043105710.0002298968555807510.0025327212763711
JUN#3725510.42735766028031.82465747415735e-050.000415356150705142
JUND#372766.994663941871038.53468650061654e-060.000232304957893638
MAFK#7975522.58394428152493.97263246201883e-071.92527963666257e-05
NR3C1#2908614.9730233311738.86442195171695e-085.24527685107857e-06
POLR2A#543062.147453176558070.01019570676818780.0380445681933176
RAD21#588558.629194912880274.63176377415657e-050.000812866370037201
STAT3#6774610.51946499715427.37398960627247e-073.26881197151736e-05
TAF1#687263.343046285745290.0007162474284635620.00573387744759359
TBP#690863.706770687096390.000385416472907960.00377922364229034
USF1#739155.30124939767330.0005003327549858890.00441262055378916



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.