Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2951: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|full_id=C2951_epididymis_ductus_embryonic_seminal_Amniotic_locus_diaphragm

Latest revision as of 12:16, 17 September 2013


Full id: C2951_epididymis_ductus_embryonic_seminal_Amniotic_locus_diaphragm



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chrX:112083964..112083975,-p6@AMOT
Hg19::chrX:112084001..112084012,-p4@AMOT
Hg19::chrX:112084017..112084031,-p3@AMOT
Hg19::chrX:112084045..112084071,-p1@AMOT


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system4.30e-3781
neural tube2.56e-3656
neural rod2.56e-3656
future spinal cord2.56e-3656
neural keel2.56e-3656
nervous system1.25e-3589
regional part of nervous system2.57e-3453
regional part of brain2.57e-3453
brain2.59e-3268
future brain2.59e-3268
ectoderm-derived structure4.43e-31171
ectoderm4.43e-31171
presumptive ectoderm4.43e-31171
adult organism3.91e-30114
neurectoderm6.92e-3086
neural plate9.19e-3082
presumptive neural plate9.19e-3082
regional part of forebrain1.53e-2741
forebrain1.53e-2741
anterior neural tube1.53e-2741
future forebrain1.53e-2741
brain grey matter3.78e-2434
gray matter3.78e-2434
telencephalon4.79e-2434
cerebral hemisphere1.17e-2232
regional part of telencephalon1.19e-2232
ecto-epithelium1.39e-22104
pre-chordal neural plate7.75e-2261
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.62e-19132
organ system subdivision6.30e-19223
cerebral cortex1.01e-1725
pallium1.01e-1725
regional part of cerebral cortex7.34e-1622
anatomical cluster8.62e-16373
neocortex1.63e-1420
organ part3.41e-12218
multi-tissue structure2.28e-10342
posterior neural tube8.57e-1015
chordal neural plate8.57e-1015
extraembryonic membrane1.48e-0914
membranous layer1.48e-0914
multi-cellular organism3.35e-09656
organ1.29e-08503
segmental subdivision of nervous system1.84e-0813
tube4.14e-08192
anatomical conduit4.91e-08240
segmental subdivision of hindbrain6.06e-0812
hindbrain6.06e-0812
presumptive hindbrain6.06e-0812
neural nucleus6.99e-089
nucleus of brain6.99e-089
basal ganglion1.02e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.02e-079
aggregate regional part of brain1.02e-079
collection of basal ganglia1.02e-079
cerebral subcortex1.02e-079


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.720743
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.113.5527
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.791759
MA0056.10
MA0057.15.56554
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.112.3581
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.599068
MA0074.11.91637
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.12.63476
MA0088.10.536981
MA0089.10
MA0090.11.54523
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.656404
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.195821
MA0146.10.221129
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.931615
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.23.66694
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.20.199162
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.11.61785
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0928415
MA0163.10.918944
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.28.14977
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTBP2#1488462.71700033932816.45042639894877e-083.97214671391398e-06
ZNF263#1012748.221841637010680.0002187871180958320.00250272812999021



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.