Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2411: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0,0,0

Latest revision as of 12:05, 17 September 2013


Full id: C2411_renal_anaplastic_medulla_argyrophil_Astrocyte_pleomorphic_mesothelioma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:43045024..43045035,-p6@C1QL1
Hg19::chr17:43045632..43045649,-p2@C1QL1
Hg19::chr17:43045651..43045694,-p1@C1QL1
Hg19::chr17:43045721..43045737,-p3@C1QL1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
nervous system1.63e-4289
central nervous system8.79e-4281
brain1.26e-3268
future brain1.26e-3268
neural tube1.32e-3256
neural rod1.32e-3256
future spinal cord1.32e-3256
neural keel1.32e-3256
regional part of nervous system2.11e-3053
regional part of brain2.11e-3053
organ system subdivision5.63e-30223
neurectoderm3.86e-2686
neural plate1.50e-2582
presumptive neural plate1.50e-2582
ectoderm-derived structure2.81e-23171
ectoderm2.81e-23171
presumptive ectoderm2.81e-23171
telencephalon2.81e-2234
regional part of forebrain3.31e-2241
forebrain3.31e-2241
anterior neural tube3.31e-2241
future forebrain3.31e-2241
brain grey matter4.33e-2234
gray matter4.33e-2234
cerebral hemisphere6.64e-2132
regional part of telencephalon9.32e-2132
ecto-epithelium7.53e-20104
pre-chordal neural plate4.18e-1961
cerebral cortex1.00e-1625
pallium1.00e-1625
anatomical cluster1.33e-15373
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.54e-14132
regional part of cerebral cortex4.03e-1422
neocortex4.97e-1320
organ part4.74e-12218
adult organism6.79e-12114
posterior neural tube1.38e-1115
chordal neural plate1.38e-1115
segmental subdivision of nervous system6.51e-1013
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.73e-0912
hindbrain1.73e-0912
presumptive hindbrain1.73e-0912
multi-tissue structure9.26e-09342
regional part of metencephalon4.58e-079
metencephalon4.58e-079
future metencephalon4.58e-079
basal ganglion5.49e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis5.49e-079
aggregate regional part of brain5.49e-079
collection of basal ganglia5.49e-079
cerebral subcortex5.49e-079
neural nucleus8.17e-079
nucleus of brain8.17e-079
organ8.34e-07503
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cell type cancer3.00e-11143
cancer6.19e-08235
disease of cellular proliferation3.01e-07239


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.17.59831
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.15.26462
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.396851
MA0056.10
MA0057.11.98521
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.11.47051
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.841508
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.599068
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.12.31225
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.912459
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.11.70272
MA0146.15.02892
MA0147.11.16748
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.27.11691
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.21.01696
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.25.79077
MA0065.20.577908
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.12.64806
MA0155.12.30186
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.11.06783
MA0163.15.3466
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.29.35212
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.12.82128
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
HMGN3#932436.133910792512940.006640696683324720.028293057598407
IRF1#365935.727872815172930.008097114790333330.0320069100937747



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.