Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2411

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:29, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2411_renal_anaplastic_medulla_argyrophil_Astrocyte_pleomorphic_mesothelioma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:43045024..43045035,-p6@C1QL1
Hg19::chr17:43045632..43045649,-p2@C1QL1
Hg19::chr17:43045651..43045694,-p1@C1QL1
Hg19::chr17:43045721..43045737,-p3@C1QL1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
nervous system1.63e-4289
central nervous system8.79e-4281
brain1.26e-3268
future brain1.26e-3268
neural tube1.32e-3256
neural rod1.32e-3256
future spinal cord1.32e-3256
neural keel1.32e-3256
regional part of nervous system2.11e-3053
regional part of brain2.11e-3053
organ system subdivision5.63e-30223
neurectoderm3.86e-2686
neural plate1.50e-2582
presumptive neural plate1.50e-2582
ectoderm-derived structure2.81e-23171
ectoderm2.81e-23171
presumptive ectoderm2.81e-23171
telencephalon2.81e-2234
regional part of forebrain3.31e-2241
forebrain3.31e-2241
anterior neural tube3.31e-2241
future forebrain3.31e-2241
brain grey matter4.33e-2234
gray matter4.33e-2234
cerebral hemisphere6.64e-2132
regional part of telencephalon9.32e-2132
ecto-epithelium7.53e-20104
pre-chordal neural plate4.18e-1961
cerebral cortex1.00e-1625
pallium1.00e-1625
anatomical cluster1.33e-15373
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.54e-14132
regional part of cerebral cortex4.03e-1422
neocortex4.97e-1320
organ part4.74e-12218
adult organism6.79e-12114
posterior neural tube1.38e-1115
chordal neural plate1.38e-1115
segmental subdivision of nervous system6.51e-1013
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.73e-0912
hindbrain1.73e-0912
presumptive hindbrain1.73e-0912
multi-tissue structure9.26e-09342
regional part of metencephalon4.58e-079
metencephalon4.58e-079
future metencephalon4.58e-079
basal ganglion5.49e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis5.49e-079
aggregate regional part of brain5.49e-079
collection of basal ganglia5.49e-079
cerebral subcortex5.49e-079
neural nucleus8.17e-079
nucleus of brain8.17e-079
organ8.34e-07503
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cell type cancer3.00e-11143
cancer6.19e-08235
disease of cellular proliferation3.01e-07239


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
HMGN3#932436.133910792512940.006640696683324720.028293057598407
IRF1#365935.727872815172930.008097114790333330.0320069100937747



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.