Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2724

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:21, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2724_Hep2_epitheloid_giant_Lymphatic_large_clear_Mesothelial



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:149087248..149087262,-p3@TM4SF1
Hg19::chr3:149087622..149087670,-p@chr3:149087622..149087670
-
Hg19::chr3:149089491..149089519,-p1@AK023364
Hg19::chr3:149095424..149095445,-p1@TM4SF1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial tube3.24e-28117
anatomical cluster1.11e-22373
vasculature4.35e-2278
vascular system4.35e-2278
vessel6.80e-2268
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm4.47e-2183
epithelial tube open at both ends5.21e-2059
blood vessel5.21e-2059
blood vasculature5.21e-2059
vascular cord5.21e-2059
anatomical conduit7.09e-20240
cell layer1.15e-18309
multi-tissue structure1.25e-18342
epithelium3.12e-18306
unilaminar epithelium3.41e-18148
mesenchyme3.32e-17160
entire embryonic mesenchyme3.32e-17160
circulatory system1.27e-16112
cardiovascular system1.94e-16109
tube3.25e-15192
artery8.55e-1542
arterial blood vessel8.55e-1542
arterial system8.55e-1542
trunk mesenchyme9.88e-15122
trunk7.70e-14199
organism subdivision2.84e-13264
systemic artery1.98e-1233
systemic arterial system1.98e-1233
anatomical system5.47e-12624
anatomical group9.02e-12625
simple squamous epithelium1.46e-1022
multi-cellular organism1.82e-10656
squamous epithelium2.41e-1025
epithelial vesicle1.02e-0978
skeletal muscle tissue2.80e-0962
striated muscle tissue2.80e-0962
myotome2.80e-0962
blood vessel endothelium3.37e-0918
endothelium3.37e-0918
cardiovascular system endothelium3.37e-0918
digestive system3.39e-09145
digestive tract3.39e-09145
primitive gut3.39e-09145
muscle tissue4.05e-0964
musculature4.05e-0964
musculature of body4.05e-0964
compound organ4.61e-0968
primordium5.85e-09160
multilaminar epithelium1.12e-0883
somite2.20e-0871
presomitic mesoderm2.20e-0871
presumptive segmental plate2.20e-0871
dermomyotome2.20e-0871
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.20e-0871
endoderm-derived structure2.23e-08160
endoderm2.23e-08160
presumptive endoderm2.23e-08160
aorta2.27e-0821
aortic system2.27e-0821
dense mesenchyme tissue2.88e-0873
subdivision of digestive tract3.10e-08118
paraxial mesoderm5.61e-0872
presumptive paraxial mesoderm5.61e-0872
larynx8.76e-089
foregut1.98e-0787
respiratory primordium7.48e-0738
endoderm of foregut7.48e-0738
primary circulatory organ9.08e-0727
heart9.83e-0724
primitive heart tube9.83e-0724
primary heart field9.83e-0724
anterior lateral plate mesoderm9.83e-0724
heart tube9.83e-0724
heart primordium9.83e-0724
cardiac mesoderm9.83e-0724
cardiogenic plate9.83e-0724
heart rudiment9.83e-0724
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma4.93e-09106


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
FOXA2#3170212.31523187633260.009361916285467240.0353501274427099



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.