Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1068

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1068_mesenchymal_chorionic_Adipocyte_tenocyte_Olfactory_mixed_Smooth



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:25140597..25140631,+p@chr1:25140597..25140631
+
Hg19::chr1:25167346..25167350,+p@chr1:25167346..25167350
+
Hg19::chr1:25168712..25168734,+p4@CLIC4
Hg19::chr1:25168967..25169063,+p2@CLIC4
Hg19::chr1:25169284..25169298,+p9@CLIC4
Hg19::chr1:25169314..25169337,+p6@CLIC4
Hg19::chr1:25169419..25169465,+p5@CLIC4
Hg19::chr1:25169469..25169513,+p3@CLIC4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
muscle tissue5.01e-0964
musculature5.01e-0964
musculature of body5.01e-0964
skeletal muscle tissue5.04e-0962
striated muscle tissue5.04e-0962
myotome5.04e-0962
dense mesenchyme tissue7.80e-0973
somite1.59e-0871
presomitic mesoderm1.59e-0871
presumptive segmental plate1.59e-0871
dermomyotome1.59e-0871
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.59e-0871
paraxial mesoderm2.01e-0872
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.01e-0872
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm2.14e-0883
vasculature3.10e-0878
vascular system3.10e-0878
multilaminar epithelium3.99e-0883
vessel2.69e-0768
artery3.34e-0742
arterial blood vessel3.34e-0742
arterial system3.34e-0742
epithelial tube open at both ends3.88e-0759
blood vessel3.88e-0759
blood vasculature3.88e-0759
vascular cord3.88e-0759
mesoderm8.98e-07315
mesoderm-derived structure8.98e-07315
presumptive mesoderm8.98e-07315
multi-cellular organism9.82e-07656


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.00101002
MA0004.10.455723
MA0006.10.300178
MA0007.10.437331
MA0009.10.918715
MA0014.10.00962431
MA0017.10.337901
MA0019.10.602411
MA0024.10.813542
MA0025.11.05265
MA0027.12.5321
MA0028.10.315574
MA0029.11.94446
MA0030.10.821423
MA0031.10.756713
MA0038.10.557409
MA0040.10.838784
MA0041.10.474018
MA0042.10.442535
MA0043.10.919032
MA0046.10.90778
MA0048.10.0955945
MA0050.11.12793
MA0051.10.553205
MA0052.10.842664
MA0055.10.028436
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.0912556
MA0058.10.362328
MA0059.10.361075
MA0060.10.190336
MA0061.10.165998
MA0063.10
MA0066.14.64281
MA0067.11.23721
MA0068.10.133123
MA0069.10.903908
MA0070.10.892666
MA0071.10.518907
MA0072.12.05773
MA0073.19.20286e-05
MA0074.10.552456
MA0076.10.377799
MA0077.10.880402
MA0078.10.652193
MA0081.10.361233
MA0083.10.926258
MA0084.11.42483
MA0087.10.885691
MA0088.10.054222
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.391903
MA0091.10.458301
MA0092.10.421159
MA0093.10.303084
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.571227
MA0101.10.30624
MA0103.10.291333
MA0105.10.0818021
MA0106.10.59853
MA0107.10.236528
MA0108.21.78113
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.405141
MA0113.10.614917
MA0114.10.231781
MA0115.11.1606
MA0116.10.239768
MA0117.10.956472
MA0119.10.345493
MA0122.10.982472
MA0124.12.5277
MA0125.11.0347
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.670358
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.16.74012
MA0136.10.564434
MA0139.10.155155
MA0140.10.516266
MA0141.10.359385
MA0142.11.72156
MA0143.12.53647
MA0144.10.623945
MA0145.10.0613434
MA0146.10.00761723
MA0147.10.243042
MA0148.10.480298
MA0149.10.506665
MA0062.20.161302
MA0035.21.28264
MA0039.20.00133745
MA0138.20.653421
MA0002.20.179788
MA0137.20.86081
MA0104.20.189646
MA0047.20.586412
MA0112.20.0572179
MA0065.20.226158
MA0150.10.386144
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.52279
MA0153.11.01778
MA0154.10.0799828
MA0155.10.0535085
MA0156.10.323987
MA0157.10.697424
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.243637
MA0160.10.495355
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0163939
MA0163.10.0104024
MA0164.10.627336
MA0080.20.818924
MA0018.20.599912
MA0099.20.523145
MA0079.21.41562e-07
MA0102.21.46209
MA0258.10.209744
MA0259.10.25092
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.