Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3359

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3359_Dendritic_Neural_signet_corpus_caudate_optic_Fibroblast



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr13:24734844..24734873,+ p4@SPATA13
Hg19::chr13:24734880..24734918,+ p2@SPATA13
Hg19::chr13:24734939..24734950,+ p8@SPATA13


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset


uberon_data


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.82e-27114
central nervous system1.16e-2581
neural tube3.86e-2556
neural rod3.86e-2556
future spinal cord3.86e-2556
neural keel3.86e-2556
regional part of nervous system2.32e-2353
regional part of brain2.32e-2353
nervous system1.15e-2189
organ system subdivision3.42e-21223
brain5.33e-2068
future brain5.33e-2068
neural plate8.05e-1982
presumptive neural plate8.05e-1982
regional part of forebrain3.31e-1841
forebrain3.31e-1841
anterior neural tube3.31e-1841
future forebrain3.31e-1841
neurectoderm4.22e-1886
brain grey matter4.04e-1734
gray matter4.04e-1734
telencephalon5.31e-1734
regional part of telencephalon5.45e-1632
cerebral hemisphere9.33e-1632
anatomical cluster1.48e-15373
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.72e-15132
pre-chordal neural plate1.09e-1261
anatomical conduit2.24e-12240
ectoderm-derived structure3.37e-12171
ectoderm3.37e-12171
presumptive ectoderm3.37e-12171
tube6.49e-12192
ecto-epithelium9.23e-12104
cerebral cortex1.02e-1125
pallium1.02e-1125
regional part of cerebral cortex3.46e-1022
neocortex3.63e-0920
multi-tissue structure4.25e-09342
posterior neural tube3.91e-0815
chordal neural plate3.91e-0815
epithelium1.94e-07306
cell layer2.46e-07309
organ part2.60e-07218
neural nucleus4.79e-079
nucleus of brain4.79e-079
segmental subdivision of nervous system5.02e-0713


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.708947
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.11.24048
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.12.15619
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.11.04561
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.12.89432
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.111.3342
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.11.31954
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.11.5295
MA0106.12.25834
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.11.80901
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.15.33893
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.213.5433
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.22.08438
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.12.02721
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.12.05956
MA0163.10.776149
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.25.16052
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.13.52796
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0324182569770465
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0321107668769033
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0319612384935117
ESR1#2099330.76860329615453.43136389821584e-050.000674893058692587
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0293652343214155



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.