Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2535

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:17, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2535_hepatoblastoma_optic_locus_occipital_globus_parietal_middle



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:16330723..16330738,+p1@C1orf64
Hg19::chr3:85327115..85327130,+p@chr3:85327115..85327130
+
Hg19::chr6:170482999..170483030,+p@chr6:170482999..170483030
+
Hg19::chr7:1130932..1130937,+p7@GPER


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0045028purinergic nucleotide receptor activity, G-protein coupled0.0103614741551866
GO:0001608nucleotide receptor activity, G-protein coupled0.0103614741551866
GO:0016502nucleotide receptor activity0.0103614741551866
GO:0001614purinergic nucleotide receptor activity0.0103614741551866



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism6.55e-81115
neural tube7.71e-4857
neural rod7.71e-4857
future spinal cord7.71e-4857
neural keel7.71e-4857
regional part of brain1.51e-4059
neural plate1.12e-3786
presumptive neural plate1.12e-3786
anterior neural tube1.42e-3642
brain2.76e-3669
future brain2.76e-3669
central nervous system3.34e-3682
neurectoderm4.95e-3690
regional part of forebrain1.09e-3541
forebrain1.09e-3541
future forebrain1.09e-3541
regional part of nervous system4.59e-3294
nervous system4.59e-3294
gray matter2.08e-2934
brain grey matter2.08e-2934
telencephalon3.61e-2934
regional part of telencephalon3.89e-2833
cerebral hemisphere4.46e-2732
pre-chordal neural plate2.76e-2661
anterior region of body6.21e-24129
craniocervical region6.21e-24129
head1.50e-23123
regional part of cerebral cortex2.40e-2322
neocortex4.17e-2120
cerebral cortex1.33e-1925
pallium1.33e-1925
ectoderm-derived structure1.96e-19169
ectoderm5.38e-19173
presumptive ectoderm5.38e-19173
anatomical conduit1.52e-18241
anatomical cluster9.70e-17286
tube1.11e-16194
posterior neural tube4.56e-1215
chordal neural plate4.56e-1215
nucleus of brain1.62e-119
neural nucleus1.62e-119
basal ganglion1.77e-119
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.77e-119
aggregate regional part of brain1.77e-119
collection of basal ganglia1.77e-119
cerebral subcortex1.77e-119
cell layer1.23e-10312
segmental subdivision of nervous system3.16e-1013
brainstem3.39e-108
epithelium8.08e-10309
organ1.35e-09511
telencephalic nucleus3.00e-097
multi-cellular organism3.71e-09659
segmental subdivision of hindbrain4.18e-0912
hindbrain4.18e-0912
presumptive hindbrain4.18e-0912
gyrus3.06e-086
organism subdivision4.76e-08365
diencephalon6.94e-087
future diencephalon6.94e-087
multi-tissue structure8.48e-08347
anatomical system8.62e-08625
temporal lobe9.08e-087
anatomical group1.04e-07626
embryo2.42e-07612
organ part2.81e-07219
limbic system4.47e-075
occipital lobe8.15e-075


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.