Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4206

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:36, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4206_Smooth_Keratinocyte_mesenchymal_Fibroblast_Bronchial_mucinous_Tracheal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:239335353..239335391,+p4@ASB1
Hg19::chr2:239335396..239335448,+p3@ASB1
Hg19::chr2:239335449..239335460,+p7@ASB1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
animal cell1.55e-20679
eukaryotic cell1.55e-20679
somatic cell5.08e-18588
mesodermal cell3.23e-16121
native cell6.51e-16722
muscle precursor cell2.46e-1358
myoblast2.46e-1358
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell2.46e-1358
embryonic cell6.45e-13250
vascular associated smooth muscle cell6.54e-1332
muscle cell1.51e-1255
smooth muscle cell2.03e-1143
smooth muscle myoblast2.03e-1143
fibroblast2.06e-1176
contractile cell7.48e-1159
somatic stem cell7.79e-11433
multi fate stem cell7.66e-10427
stem cell1.86e-09441
electrically responsive cell1.93e-0961
electrically active cell1.93e-0961
cardiocyte1.94e-0716
defensive cell2.38e-0748
phagocyte2.38e-0748
aortic smooth muscle cell4.83e-0710
respiratory epithelial cell6.26e-0713
classical monocyte9.89e-0742
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte9.89e-0742
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
artery7.98e-2242
arterial blood vessel7.98e-2242
arterial system7.98e-2242
systemic artery2.23e-1833
systemic arterial system2.23e-1833
epithelial tube open at both ends1.88e-1759
blood vessel1.88e-1759
blood vasculature1.88e-1759
vascular cord1.88e-1759
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.01e-1683
vessel1.40e-1668
vasculature2.06e-1678
vascular system2.06e-1678
epithelial tube3.41e-15117
unilaminar epithelium5.48e-14148
mesoderm3.70e-13315
mesoderm-derived structure3.70e-13315
presumptive mesoderm3.70e-13315
epithelial vesicle1.50e-1278
somite1.71e-1271
presomitic mesoderm1.71e-1271
presumptive segmental plate1.71e-1271
dermomyotome1.71e-1271
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.71e-1271
cardiovascular system2.14e-12109
paraxial mesoderm4.30e-1272
presumptive paraxial mesoderm4.30e-1272
dense mesenchyme tissue6.22e-1273
lateral plate mesoderm9.18e-12203
anatomical system9.35e-12624
musculoskeletal system1.31e-11167
anatomical group1.37e-11625
skeletal muscle tissue1.50e-1162
striated muscle tissue1.50e-1162
myotome1.50e-1162
circulatory system1.82e-11112
multilaminar epithelium2.32e-1183
aorta3.20e-1121
aortic system3.20e-1121
trunk mesenchyme6.11e-11122
muscle tissue1.40e-1064
musculature1.40e-1064
musculature of body1.40e-1064
multi-cellular organism4.85e-10656
germ layer5.50e-10560
germ layer / neural crest5.50e-10560
embryonic tissue5.50e-10560
presumptive structure5.50e-10560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure5.50e-10560
epiblast (generic)5.50e-10560
embryonic structure9.80e-10564
trunk4.94e-09199
epithelium2.03e-08306
cell layer6.29e-08309
developing anatomical structure8.61e-08581
organism subdivision1.22e-07264
blood vessel smooth muscle4.83e-0710
arterial system smooth muscle4.83e-0710
artery smooth muscle tissue4.83e-0710
aorta smooth muscle tissue4.83e-0710
embryo7.47e-07592


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326301410095763
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0321456185130922
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0463529884760566
ELK4#2005316.2356816584680.0002336043955745990.00256033261301454
ETS1#211339.728760922202340.001085840092584840.00763715088083155
GABPB1#255337.067683836182170.002832212825417420.0154461344790481
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0270169505001171
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0173283031415987
REST#597839.650028716128020.001112636247114590.00769349953736763
RFX5#5993312.04791082719510.0005717246050312580.00485528915472919
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.00248790935961074
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00617165854762321



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.