Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1255

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:09, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1255_cerebellum_postcentral_brain_paracentral_frontal_temporal_pons



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:1950743..1950748,+p3@GABRD
Hg19::chr20:10273831..10273842,-p@chr20:10273831..10273842
-
Hg19::chr20:10286834..10286851,-p1@CU679782
Hg19::chr20:10287450..10287493,-p@chr20:10287450..10287493
-
Hg19::chr20:10287525..10287552,-p@chr20:10287525..10287552
-
Hg19::chr3:184103946..184103949,+p@chr3:184103946..184103949
+
Hg19::chr7:100244171..100244173,-p@chr7:100244171..100244173
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0004890GABA-A receptor activity0.0185673269389271
GO:0016917GABA receptor activity0.0185673269389271
GO:0043168anion binding0.0185673269389271
GO:0031404chloride ion binding0.0185673269389271
GO:0005254chloride channel activity0.0185673269389271
GO:0005253anion channel activity0.0185673269389271
GO:0005230extracellular ligand-gated ion channel activity0.0185673269389271
GO:0030594neurotransmitter receptor activity0.0185673269389271
GO:0042165neurotransmitter binding0.0185673269389271
GO:0045211postsynaptic membrane0.0185673269389271
GO:0044456synapse part0.0185673269389271
GO:0015276ligand-gated ion channel activity0.0185673269389271
GO:0022834ligand-gated channel activity0.0185673269389271
GO:0008509anion transmembrane transporter activity0.0219718759987216
GO:0007268synaptic transmission0.0284548059185996
GO:0019226transmission of nerve impulse0.0303558813140233
GO:0030054cell junction0.0371413136077462
GO:0022836gated channel activity0.0412921752554391
GO:0007267cell-cell signaling0.044665939725298
GO:0005216ion channel activity0.044665939725298
GO:0022838substrate specific channel activity0.044665939725298
GO:0015267channel activity0.044665939725298
GO:0022803passive transmembrane transporter activity0.044665939725298



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube1.06e-4757
neural rod1.06e-4757
future spinal cord1.06e-4757
neural keel1.06e-4757
central nervous system8.78e-4682
regional part of nervous system1.14e-4494
nervous system1.14e-4494
brain4.43e-4069
future brain4.43e-4069
regional part of brain4.01e-3959
regional part of forebrain4.82e-3841
forebrain4.82e-3841
future forebrain4.82e-3841
anterior neural tube8.14e-3742
telencephalon4.36e-3534
adult organism4.70e-35115
gray matter5.27e-3534
brain grey matter5.27e-3534
regional part of telencephalon9.87e-3433
neural plate1.26e-3386
presumptive neural plate1.26e-3386
cerebral hemisphere6.00e-3332
neurectoderm1.90e-3290
pre-chordal neural plate2.40e-2561
cerebral cortex1.46e-2425
pallium1.46e-2425
regional part of cerebral cortex2.06e-2422
neocortex4.76e-2220
head5.44e-20123
ectoderm-derived structure5.46e-19169
ectoderm9.96e-19173
presumptive ectoderm9.96e-19173
anterior region of body3.32e-18129
craniocervical region3.32e-18129
tube5.68e-13194
basal ganglion4.03e-129
nuclear complex of neuraxis4.03e-129
aggregate regional part of brain4.03e-129
collection of basal ganglia4.03e-129
cerebral subcortex4.03e-129
nucleus of brain6.67e-129
neural nucleus6.67e-129
posterior neural tube1.01e-1115
chordal neural plate1.01e-1115
anatomical conduit3.16e-10241
epithelium7.78e-10309
segmental subdivision of nervous system1.02e-0913
telencephalic nucleus1.32e-097
cell layer1.61e-09312
gyrus2.76e-096
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.12e-0812
hindbrain1.12e-0812
presumptive hindbrain1.12e-0812
anatomical cluster1.22e-08286
temporal lobe1.37e-087
brainstem3.19e-088
multi-tissue structure4.84e-08347
organism subdivision5.48e-08365
limbic system8.30e-085
occipital lobe1.29e-075


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.