Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3054

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:54, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3054_mature_locus_thalamus_pons_amygdala_diencephalon_hippocampus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:88718314..88718388,+p1@SNCG
Hg19::chr1:161101568..161101584,+p@chr1:161101568..161101584
+
Hg19::chr1:27120942..27120945,-p@chr1:27120942..27120945
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism3.57e-41114
neural tube7.91e-3456
neural rod7.91e-3456
future spinal cord7.91e-3456
neural keel7.91e-3456
regional part of nervous system3.47e-3253
regional part of brain3.47e-3253
regional part of forebrain9.27e-2741
forebrain9.27e-2741
anterior neural tube9.27e-2741
future forebrain9.27e-2741
neural plate9.41e-2582
presumptive neural plate9.41e-2582
brain grey matter6.58e-2434
gray matter6.58e-2434
telencephalon3.92e-2334
neurectoderm7.11e-2386
brain7.42e-2368
future brain7.42e-2368
central nervous system3.44e-2281
regional part of telencephalon2.12e-2132
ecto-epithelium3.72e-21104
cerebral hemisphere4.40e-2132
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest4.89e-21132
nervous system1.52e-1889
pre-chordal neural plate1.48e-1661
regional part of cerebral cortex7.27e-1622
anatomical conduit1.20e-15240
tube2.17e-15192
neocortex1.05e-1320
anatomical cluster1.36e-13373
neural nucleus1.68e-139
nucleus of brain1.68e-139
cerebral cortex2.36e-1325
pallium2.36e-1325
basal ganglion2.43e-139
nuclear complex of neuraxis2.43e-139
aggregate regional part of brain2.43e-139
collection of basal ganglia2.43e-139
cerebral subcortex2.43e-139
organ system subdivision3.40e-12223
organ part1.17e-11218
telencephalic nucleus9.28e-117
epithelium2.36e-10306
cell layer4.90e-10309
ectoderm-derived structure7.76e-10171
ectoderm7.76e-10171
presumptive ectoderm7.76e-10171
brainstem3.55e-096
multi-tissue structure7.66e-09342
gyrus1.74e-086
posterior neural tube3.05e-0815
chordal neural plate3.05e-0815
limbic system9.57e-085
organ4.28e-07503
corpus striatum8.69e-074
striatum8.69e-074
ventral part of telencephalon8.69e-074
future corpus striatum8.69e-074
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.00e-0612
hindbrain1.00e-0612
presumptive hindbrain1.00e-0612


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.