Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4147

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:11, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4147_extraskeletal_occipital_small_brain_medial_temporal_insula



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:175869890..175869933,-p6@CHN1
Hg19::chr2:175869936..175869949,-p14@CHN1
Hg19::chr2:175869984..175869996,-p9@CHN1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neural cell1.19e-0725
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system5.47e-3294
nervous system5.47e-3294
central nervous system1.94e-3182
neural tube2.06e-2657
neural rod2.06e-2657
future spinal cord2.06e-2657
neural keel2.06e-2657
neurectoderm4.70e-2690
neural plate7.85e-2686
presumptive neural plate7.85e-2686
brain9.52e-2669
future brain9.52e-2669
adult organism2.64e-25115
anterior neural tube3.23e-2542
regional part of forebrain1.01e-2441
forebrain1.01e-2441
future forebrain1.01e-2441
telencephalon1.30e-2334
gray matter2.70e-2334
brain grey matter2.70e-2334
cerebral hemisphere3.67e-2332
regional part of telencephalon7.34e-2333
regional part of brain9.03e-2359
pre-chordal neural plate1.58e-2261
anatomical cluster1.12e-20286
cerebral cortex7.81e-1925
pallium7.81e-1925
head8.59e-19123
ectoderm1.69e-18173
presumptive ectoderm1.69e-18173
anterior region of body3.01e-18129
craniocervical region3.01e-18129
anatomical conduit4.63e-18241
ectoderm-derived structure4.83e-18169
regional part of cerebral cortex4.35e-1722
tube2.09e-16194
neocortex7.40e-1620
cell layer2.27e-14312
epithelium3.42e-14309
organ part5.98e-14219
multi-tissue structure6.77e-14347
organism subdivision4.91e-13365
multi-cellular organism8.28e-12659
anatomical group9.68e-10626
anatomical system1.38e-09625
embryo4.28e-09612
embryonic structure2.51e-07605
developing anatomical structure2.51e-07605
germ layer3.80e-07604
embryonic tissue3.80e-07604
presumptive structure3.80e-07604
epiblast (generic)3.80e-07604
organ8.60e-07511
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cell type cancer1.50e-09143
carcinoma2.40e-08106


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0280113675321078
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326180963670715
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0323077346596606
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0108899624435329
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0295117886583654
NANOG#79923329.24477848101273.99627955670032e-050.000738442039317454
SREBF1#6720347.00584944048839.62099323994382e-060.000254962424000632
TAF7#6879311.43306940492390.0006690181981945830.00544213658394299
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00616935603361499
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0330057711970017
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109640163705534



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.