Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2228

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:06, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr17:90745937..90745941,-p@chr17:90745937..90745941
-
Mm9::chr3:8561096..8561110,+p@chr3:8561096..8561110
+
Mm9::chr5:23665663..23665666,+p@chr5:23665663..23665666
+
Mm9::chrX:98516253..98516269,+p@chrX:98516253..98516269
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system4.10e-3554
central nervous system8.04e-3573
gray matter5.37e-3434
nervous system1.05e-3375
neural tube5.08e-3152
neural rod5.08e-3152
future spinal cord5.08e-3152
neural keel5.08e-3152
neurectoderm5.93e-2664
neural plate5.93e-2664
presumptive neural plate5.93e-2664
ectoderm-derived structure4.14e-2595
ectoderm4.14e-2595
presumptive ectoderm4.14e-2595
brain grey matter1.55e-2329
regional part of telencephalon1.55e-2329
telencephalon1.55e-2329
regional part of brain1.66e-2246
ecto-epithelium5.96e-2273
brain6.52e-2247
future brain6.52e-2247
regional part of forebrain2.35e-1839
forebrain2.35e-1839
future forebrain2.35e-1839
anterior neural tube8.76e-1840
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest4.52e-1692
posterior neural tube5.46e-1512
chordal neural plate5.46e-1512
cerebral cortex1.91e-1421
cerebral hemisphere1.91e-1421
pallium1.91e-1421
pre-chordal neural plate1.08e-1349
regional part of spinal cord3.57e-135
gray matter of spinal cord3.57e-135
spinal cord6.60e-116
dorsal region element6.60e-116
dorsum6.60e-116
tube1.08e-10114
basal ganglion1.27e-108
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.27e-108
aggregate regional part of brain1.27e-108
collection of basal ganglia1.27e-108
cerebral subcortex1.27e-108
anatomical conduit1.41e-09122
ventral horn of spinal cord4.50e-093
organ system subdivision1.48e-08194
regional part of cerebral cortex3.22e-0817
substantia nigra9.02e-083
telencephalic nucleus9.02e-083
midbrain nucleus9.02e-083
neural nucleus9.02e-083
nucleus of brain9.02e-083
organ part8.17e-0799


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}