Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1331

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 13:51, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1331_cerebellum_pineal_Neural_medulla_parietal_hippocampus_optic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:115263782..115263785,-p@chr11:115263782..115263785
-
Hg19::chr13:113685172..113685179,+p@chr13:113685172..113685179
+
Hg19::chr1:160163170..160163181,+p@chr1:160163170..160163181
+
Hg19::chr1:202594169..202594182,-p@chr1:202594169..202594182
-
Hg19::chr20:62864254..62864290,+p@chr20:62864254..62864290
+
Hg19::chr6:37615324..37615328,-p21@MDGA1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube7.74e-4457
neural rod7.74e-4457
future spinal cord7.74e-4457
neural keel7.74e-4457
regional part of nervous system1.65e-3994
nervous system1.65e-3994
central nervous system2.01e-3782
regional part of brain3.45e-3759
neural plate1.42e-3586
presumptive neural plate1.42e-3586
neurectoderm4.50e-3590
brain3.23e-3369
future brain3.23e-3369
regional part of forebrain8.34e-3341
forebrain8.34e-3341
future forebrain8.34e-3341
anterior neural tube7.84e-3242
gray matter2.41e-2934
brain grey matter2.41e-2934
telencephalon6.60e-2934
regional part of telencephalon3.00e-2733
adult organism2.70e-26115
pre-chordal neural plate3.31e-2661
cerebral hemisphere8.85e-2632
ectoderm2.23e-24173
presumptive ectoderm2.23e-24173
ectoderm-derived structure2.99e-24169
anterior region of body4.21e-20129
craniocervical region4.21e-20129
head2.17e-19123
regional part of cerebral cortex3.35e-1722
cerebral cortex6.53e-1725
pallium6.53e-1725
neocortex1.99e-1620
nucleus of brain3.01e-159
neural nucleus3.01e-159
tube3.91e-13194
posterior neural tube7.88e-1315
chordal neural plate7.88e-1315
segmental subdivision of nervous system1.49e-1213
basal ganglion1.44e-119
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.44e-119
aggregate regional part of brain1.44e-119
collection of basal ganglia1.44e-119
cerebral subcortex1.44e-119
telencephalic nucleus2.84e-117
segmental subdivision of hindbrain8.14e-1112
hindbrain8.14e-1112
presumptive hindbrain8.14e-1112
brainstem7.48e-108
epithelium1.06e-09309
cell layer1.84e-09312
anatomical cluster2.31e-09286
organ part2.32e-09219
anatomical conduit9.81e-09241
gyrus1.52e-086
regional part of metencephalon1.72e-089
metencephalon1.72e-089
future metencephalon1.72e-089
pons1.10e-073
brainstem nucleus1.25e-073
middle temporal gyrus4.40e-073
parietal lobe4.67e-075


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ZNF274#107821236.9576923076920.004212805738819990.02005475265767



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.