Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4129

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:42, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4129_cerebellum_spinal_small_diencephalon_medulla_Neural_lung



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:135476552..135476576,-p1@TMEM163
Hg19::chr2:135476580..135476593,-p4@TMEM163
Hg19::chr2:135476600..135476615,-p3@TMEM163


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube2.47e-3756
neural rod2.47e-3756
future spinal cord2.47e-3756
neural keel2.47e-3756
central nervous system3.99e-3681
regional part of nervous system2.35e-3453
regional part of brain2.35e-3453
nervous system8.76e-3389
adult organism1.28e-32114
brain1.77e-3068
future brain1.77e-3068
regional part of forebrain2.80e-2941
forebrain2.80e-2941
anterior neural tube2.80e-2941
future forebrain2.80e-2941
brain grey matter2.97e-2434
gray matter2.97e-2434
neural plate3.48e-2482
presumptive neural plate3.48e-2482
telencephalon9.07e-2434
regional part of telencephalon2.36e-2232
cerebral hemisphere3.09e-2232
neurectoderm4.55e-2286
pre-chordal neural plate9.56e-1861
cerebral cortex2.07e-1725
pallium2.07e-1725
tube6.45e-17192
ecto-epithelium2.08e-15104
regional part of cerebral cortex5.50e-1522
neocortex1.64e-1320
organ system subdivision3.63e-13223
anatomical conduit7.63e-13240
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.38e-11132
anatomical cluster3.98e-11373
ectoderm-derived structure1.10e-10171
ectoderm1.10e-10171
presumptive ectoderm1.10e-10171
posterior neural tube3.79e-0915
chordal neural plate3.79e-0915
neural nucleus2.47e-089
nucleus of brain2.47e-089
organ4.66e-08503
basal ganglion5.80e-089
nuclear complex of neuraxis5.80e-089
aggregate regional part of brain5.80e-089
collection of basal ganglia5.80e-089
cerebral subcortex5.80e-089
embryo1.44e-07592
anatomical group1.87e-07625
segmental subdivision of nervous system2.31e-0713
developing anatomical structure2.56e-07581
anatomical system2.91e-07624
endothelial tube3.78e-079
arterial system endothelium3.78e-079
endothelium of artery3.78e-079
diencephalon6.14e-077
future diencephalon6.14e-077
temporal lobe6.93e-076
immune system8.12e-0793
brainstem9.35e-076


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326096704066844



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.