Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1789

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:06, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1789_Small_MCF7_occipital_temporal_parietal_duodenum_brain



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:61043561..61043617,+p@chr17:61043561..61043617
+
Hg19::chr17:61043618..61043648,+p@chr17:61043618..61043648
+
Hg19::chr17:61043653..61043672,+p@chr17:61043653..61043672
+
Hg19::chr17:61043790..61043869,+p@chr17:61043790..61043869
+
Hg19::chr17:61043870..61043902,+p@chr17:61043870..61043902
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
respiratory epithelial cell9.65e-0813
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube1.72e-2356
neural rod1.72e-2356
future spinal cord1.72e-2356
neural keel1.72e-2356
regional part of nervous system2.32e-2253
regional part of brain2.32e-2253
central nervous system4.21e-2281
nervous system5.57e-2289
brain2.17e-2168
future brain2.17e-2168
regional part of forebrain1.71e-1941
forebrain1.71e-1941
anterior neural tube1.71e-1941
future forebrain1.71e-1941
telencephalon1.67e-1834
brain grey matter3.34e-1834
gray matter3.34e-1834
ecto-epithelium6.86e-18104
cerebral hemisphere7.68e-1832
ectoderm-derived structure1.41e-17171
ectoderm1.41e-17171
presumptive ectoderm1.41e-17171
regional part of telencephalon1.53e-1732
anatomical system1.71e-16624
anatomical group4.12e-16625
multi-cellular organism8.19e-16656
neural plate5.78e-1582
presumptive neural plate5.78e-1582
cerebral cortex8.10e-1425
pallium8.10e-1425
regional part of cerebral cortex2.16e-1322
neurectoderm7.93e-1386
neocortex1.08e-1220
organ1.30e-12503
pre-chordal neural plate7.21e-1261
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.46e-11132
organ system subdivision1.28e-10223
embryonic structure4.65e-10564
developing anatomical structure5.54e-10581
organ part2.11e-09218
germ layer2.56e-09560
germ layer / neural crest2.56e-09560
embryonic tissue2.56e-09560
presumptive structure2.56e-09560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure2.56e-09560
epiblast (generic)2.56e-09560
embryo5.25e-09592
epithelium1.43e-08306
cell layer3.89e-08309
tube3.19e-07192
anatomical conduit7.66e-07240
multi-tissue structure9.03e-07342


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90556.336201576962639.78880505817628e-050.00139036177270621
CTCF#1066455.360256373075030.0002259278299937090.00249768991602762
CTCFL#140690519.74647435897443.32745051287657e-071.6572036438451e-05
E2F1#186954.907389214879320.0003512818099256460.00352730708074459
E2F6#187655.017155731697390.0003144978599297790.00322777535310595
EGR1#195854.988179094810140.0003237398000590710.00330767569735564
HMGN3#932458.178547723350592.73180911341838e-050.000581903756875998
NR3C1#2908514.9730233311731.32777388277837e-065.2427741604344e-05
TRIM28#10155311.15431502715750.001433159271529250.00920187637767388
ZBTB7A#5134157.35190930787594.65425347594289e-050.000815716695375062



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.