Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3923

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:33, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3923_mesenchymal_Mesothelial_Fibroblast_leiomyoma_basal_mature_epithelioid



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:203596195..203596206,+p5@ATP2B4
Hg19::chr1:203596211..203596216,+p6@ATP2B4
Hg19::chr1:203596217..203596249,+p3@ATP2B4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm2.37e-1584
blood vessel6.01e-1460
epithelial tube open at both ends6.01e-1460
blood vasculature6.01e-1460
vascular cord6.01e-1460
vasculature4.46e-1379
vascular system4.46e-1379
vessel1.19e-1269
somite6.50e-1283
paraxial mesoderm6.50e-1283
presomitic mesoderm6.50e-1283
presumptive segmental plate6.50e-1283
trunk paraxial mesoderm6.50e-1283
presumptive paraxial mesoderm6.50e-1283
artery2.04e-1142
arterial blood vessel2.04e-1142
arterial system2.04e-1142
muscle tissue1.35e-1063
musculature1.35e-1063
musculature of body1.35e-1063
dermomyotome2.77e-1070
systemic artery3.23e-1033
systemic arterial system3.23e-1033
skeletal muscle tissue3.63e-1061
striated muscle tissue3.63e-1061
myotome3.63e-1061
organism subdivision4.12e-10365
circulatory system5.42e-10113
cardiovascular system3.61e-09110
multilaminar epithelium8.02e-0982
epithelial tube9.18e-09118
multi-cellular organism2.11e-08659
aorta2.76e-0821
aortic system2.76e-0821
epithelium7.83e-08309
cell layer1.05e-07312
tube2.30e-07194
anatomical cluster2.85e-07286
trunk mesenchyme3.67e-07143
anatomical conduit4.34e-07241
anatomical system5.44e-07625
anatomical group6.68e-07626


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.