Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2269

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2269_merkel_small_Mast_anaplastic_acute_colon_pineal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr13:72441074..72441172,- p2@DACH1
Hg19::chr13:72441259..72441268,- p8@DACH1
Hg19::chr13:72441289..72441300,- p13@DACH1
Hg19::chr13:72441315..72441454,- p1@DACH1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset


uberon_data


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.86e-32114
neural plate2.99e-2182
presumptive neural plate2.99e-2182
neural tube1.31e-2056
neural rod1.31e-2056
future spinal cord1.31e-2056
neural keel1.31e-2056
central nervous system1.55e-2081
regional part of nervous system2.20e-2053
regional part of brain2.20e-2053
nervous system3.08e-2089
neurectoderm7.10e-2086
brain2.19e-1868
future brain2.19e-1868
pre-chordal neural plate1.12e-1661
regional part of forebrain2.31e-1541
forebrain2.31e-1541
anterior neural tube2.31e-1541
future forebrain2.31e-1541
ecto-epithelium9.44e-15104
anatomical cluster1.48e-12373
organ system subdivision1.58e-12223
brain grey matter3.24e-1234
gray matter3.24e-1234
telencephalon1.17e-1134
cerebral hemisphere1.53e-1132
regional part of telencephalon2.68e-1132
ectoderm-derived structure1.23e-10171
ectoderm1.23e-10171
presumptive ectoderm1.23e-10171
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.07e-10132
embryo3.51e-10592
developing anatomical structure3.77e-09581
germ layer1.80e-08560
germ layer / neural crest1.80e-08560
embryonic tissue1.80e-08560
presumptive structure1.80e-08560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure1.80e-08560
epiblast (generic)1.80e-08560
embryonic structure2.19e-08564
cerebral cortex3.47e-0825
pallium3.47e-0825
multi-cellular organism3.99e-08656
organ5.67e-08503
tube3.01e-07192
neocortex6.73e-0720
anatomical conduit8.61e-07240
anatomical system8.89e-07624


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0938548
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.524262
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.11.35734
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.396851
MA0056.10
MA0057.11.28333
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.15.1904
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.129.6888
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.536981
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.11.57689
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.11.09982
MA0145.10.195821
MA0146.10.061409
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.22.52211
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.20.577908
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.11.61785
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0928415
MA0163.10.0725493
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.23.97967
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
MAX#414946.452555509007120.0005767613195645490.00484799802446696
TRIM28#10155418.59052504526258.36730015875654e-060.000229845465881214
USF1#739146.361499277207960.0006105011399140830.00507240481714295
ZNF263#1012748.221841637010680.0002187871180958320.00248206689407024



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.