Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4129

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:10, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4129_cerebellum_spinal_small_diencephalon_medulla_Neural_lung



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:135476552..135476576,-p1@TMEM163
Hg19::chr2:135476580..135476593,-p4@TMEM163
Hg19::chr2:135476600..135476615,-p3@TMEM163


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism7.33e-37115
neural tube1.94e-3657
neural rod1.94e-3657
future spinal cord1.94e-3657
neural keel1.94e-3657
central nervous system1.03e-3482
regional part of nervous system2.97e-2994
nervous system2.97e-2994
regional part of brain8.48e-2959
brain1.53e-2869
future brain1.53e-2869
anterior neural tube6.09e-2842
regional part of forebrain7.64e-2841
forebrain7.64e-2841
future forebrain7.64e-2841
neural plate1.92e-2386
presumptive neural plate1.92e-2386
gray matter2.11e-2334
brain grey matter2.11e-2334
telencephalon4.18e-2334
regional part of telencephalon1.97e-2233
neurectoderm9.33e-2290
cerebral hemisphere1.00e-2132
cerebral cortex1.85e-1725
pallium1.85e-1725
pre-chordal neural plate3.79e-1661
regional part of cerebral cortex1.02e-1522
tube4.75e-15194
neocortex1.94e-1420
anterior region of body5.06e-12129
craniocervical region5.06e-12129
head6.38e-12123
anatomical conduit2.58e-11241
ectoderm-derived structure6.67e-11169
ectoderm2.56e-10173
presumptive ectoderm2.56e-10173
posterior neural tube1.63e-0915
chordal neural plate1.63e-0915
organ3.03e-08511
segmental subdivision of nervous system6.68e-0813
embryo9.94e-08612
anatomical group1.52e-07626
nucleus of brain2.18e-079
neural nucleus2.18e-079
anatomical system2.40e-07625
embryonic structure3.43e-07605
developing anatomical structure3.43e-07605
segmental subdivision of hindbrain3.87e-0712
hindbrain3.87e-0712
presumptive hindbrain3.87e-0712
basal ganglion4.50e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis4.50e-079
aggregate regional part of brain4.50e-079
collection of basal ganglia4.50e-079
cerebral subcortex4.50e-079
anatomical cluster4.52e-07286
germ layer5.07e-07604
embryonic tissue5.07e-07604
presumptive structure5.07e-07604
epiblast (generic)5.07e-07604
brainstem6.43e-078


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326096704066844



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.