Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1427

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:53, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1427_Mast_Monocytederived_granulocyte_CD14_testicular_Macrophage_acute



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:10101893..10101900,-p21@GAS7
Hg19::chr17:10101909..10101934,-p2@GAS7
Hg19::chr17:10101952..10101963,-p14@GAS7
Hg19::chr17:10102156..10102163,-p23@GAS7
Hg19::chr17:10102176..10102203,-p4@GAS7
Hg19::chr17:10102207..10102229,-p7@GAS7


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
myeloid leukocyte7.96e-3672
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.26e-3267
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.05e-3066
monopoietic cell1.52e-3059
monocyte1.52e-3059
monoblast1.52e-3059
promonocyte1.52e-3059
defensive cell2.07e-3048
phagocyte2.07e-3048
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.62e-2961
classical monocyte1.67e-2642
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.67e-2642
stuff accumulating cell3.76e-1987
myeloid cell1.49e-18108
common myeloid progenitor1.49e-18108
leukocyte4.25e-16136
nongranular leukocyte1.12e-13115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.33e-13120
hematopoietic stem cell1.54e-10168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.54e-10168
hematopoietic cell2.48e-10177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell9.58e-10161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell9.58e-10161
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system5.96e-2898
blood island5.96e-2898
hemolymphoid system6.48e-26108
bone marrow1.00e-2576
adult organism2.74e-24114
immune system2.17e-2393
bone element3.43e-2382
skeletal element4.55e-1890
skeletal system4.35e-16100
central nervous system3.73e-1381
neural tube4.31e-1356
neural rod4.31e-1356
future spinal cord4.31e-1356
neural keel4.31e-1356
regional part of nervous system1.45e-1253
regional part of brain1.45e-1253
tissue2.98e-12773
neural plate5.05e-1282
presumptive neural plate5.05e-1282
neurectoderm9.45e-1286
brain1.10e-1168
future brain1.10e-1168
regional part of forebrain2.57e-1141
forebrain2.57e-1141
anterior neural tube2.57e-1141
future forebrain2.57e-1141
organ1.02e-10503
nervous system3.61e-1089
telencephalon5.64e-1034
pre-chordal neural plate1.79e-0961
brain grey matter1.90e-0934
gray matter1.90e-0934
cerebral hemisphere2.42e-0932
regional part of telencephalon4.60e-0932
neocortex2.66e-0820
regional part of cerebral cortex4.35e-0822
mesoderm4.88e-08315
mesoderm-derived structure4.88e-08315
presumptive mesoderm4.88e-08315
cerebral cortex9.89e-0825
pallium9.89e-0825
lateral plate mesoderm1.62e-07203
musculoskeletal system3.60e-07167
germ layer4.37e-07560
germ layer / neural crest4.37e-07560
embryonic tissue4.37e-07560
presumptive structure4.37e-07560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure4.37e-07560
epiblast (generic)4.37e-07560
embryonic structure8.63e-07564


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.