Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4637

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:52, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4637_Smooth_leiomyoma_mesenchymal_Iris_glioblastoma_Lens_Ciliary



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:102553382..102553397,+p3@LRRC17
Hg19::chr7:102553430..102553456,+p1@LRRC17
Hg19::chr7:102553470..102553487,+p2@LRRC17


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
skeletal muscle tissue1.82e-3162
striated muscle tissue1.82e-3162
myotome1.82e-3162
muscle tissue2.05e-3164
musculature2.05e-3164
musculature of body2.05e-3164
dense mesenchyme tissue3.14e-3073
somite6.15e-3071
presomitic mesoderm6.15e-3071
presumptive segmental plate6.15e-3071
dermomyotome6.15e-3071
trunk paraxial mesoderm6.15e-3071
paraxial mesoderm9.94e-3072
presumptive paraxial mesoderm9.94e-3072
epithelial vesicle4.47e-2878
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.40e-2483
multilaminar epithelium3.09e-2383
vasculature4.81e-2178
vascular system4.81e-2178
trunk mesenchyme5.77e-20122
cardiovascular system1.68e-19109
mesenchyme5.32e-19160
entire embryonic mesenchyme5.32e-19160
circulatory system5.75e-19112
artery8.98e-1942
arterial blood vessel8.98e-1942
arterial system8.98e-1942
unilaminar epithelium9.68e-19148
epithelial tube3.56e-17117
epithelial tube open at both ends4.49e-1759
blood vessel4.49e-1759
blood vasculature4.49e-1759
vascular cord4.49e-1759
systemic artery4.77e-1733
systemic arterial system4.77e-1733
vessel4.05e-1568
mesoderm1.17e-14315
mesoderm-derived structure1.17e-14315
presumptive mesoderm1.17e-14315
cell layer4.79e-14309
anatomical cluster2.09e-13373
multi-tissue structure3.60e-13342
epithelium4.99e-13306
organism subdivision5.59e-13264
multi-cellular organism7.76e-12656
heart4.54e-1124
primitive heart tube4.54e-1124
primary heart field4.54e-1124
anterior lateral plate mesoderm4.54e-1124
heart tube4.54e-1124
heart primordium4.54e-1124
cardiac mesoderm4.54e-1124
cardiogenic plate4.54e-1124
heart rudiment4.54e-1124
embryonic structure1.55e-10564
tissue1.65e-10773
trunk1.83e-10199
germ layer3.06e-10560
germ layer / neural crest3.06e-10560
embryonic tissue3.06e-10560
presumptive structure3.06e-10560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure3.06e-10560
epiblast (generic)3.06e-10560
anatomical system3.08e-10624
developing anatomical structure3.66e-10581
anatomical group4.42e-10625
primary circulatory organ6.92e-1027
smooth muscle tissue8.49e-1015
embryo9.72e-10592
aorta1.52e-0921
aortic system1.52e-0921
blood vessel smooth muscle3.09e-0810
arterial system smooth muscle3.09e-0810
artery smooth muscle tissue3.09e-0810
aorta smooth muscle tissue3.09e-0810
anatomical conduit8.05e-08240
tube1.31e-07192
vasculature of organ3.40e-0711
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer3.90e-0814


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.