Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3224

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:54, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3224_Fibroblast_Dendritic_basal_chronic_leiomyoma_Renal_Aortic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:105724535..105724548,+p3@C12orf75
Hg19::chr12:105724590..105724612,+p4@C12orf75
Hg19::chr12:105724613..105724666,+p2@C12orf75


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast2.75e-1476
somatic cell1.21e-12588
native cell2.21e-12722
skin fibroblast2.67e-1123
smooth muscle cell1.04e-0943
smooth muscle myoblast1.04e-0943
multi fate stem cell1.96e-09427
somatic stem cell5.77e-09433
vascular associated smooth muscle cell7.43e-0932
animal cell1.52e-08679
eukaryotic cell1.52e-08679
stem cell1.89e-08441
muscle precursor cell7.41e-0858
myoblast7.41e-0858
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell7.41e-0858
T cell7.89e-0825
pro-T cell7.89e-0825
contractile cell8.35e-0859
lymphocyte8.64e-0853
common lymphoid progenitor8.64e-0853
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.02e-0752
kidney tubule cell2.07e-0710
nephron tubule epithelial cell2.07e-0710
muscle cell2.87e-0755
mature alpha-beta T cell5.91e-0718
alpha-beta T cell5.91e-0718
immature T cell5.91e-0718
mature T cell5.91e-0718
immature alpha-beta T cell5.91e-0718
nucleate cell9.20e-0755


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F4#1874312.66806031528440.0004917987006298980.00435907362259917
FOS#235338.99795530889440.001372499272417130.00895163002010695
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.018590700604374
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0268733044425877
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0172425698890611
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0275655181495951
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0245608799601426
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.00247514948684
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00613411303231012



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.