Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3325: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=-0.128497223369071

Latest revision as of 12:23, 17 September 2013


Full id: C3325_Mesenchymal_cerebellum_Cardiac_large_brain_vagina_pineal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:7036797..7036884,+p@chr12:7036797..7036884
+
Hg19::chr12:7036941..7036986,+p1@ATN1
Hg19::chr12:7036987..7037005,+p2@ATN1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anatomical cluster7.56e-34373
adult organism1.37e-32114
neural tube3.14e-2956
neural rod3.14e-2956
future spinal cord3.14e-2956
neural keel3.14e-2956
neural plate1.97e-2882
presumptive neural plate1.97e-2882
multi-tissue structure1.99e-28342
neurectoderm4.24e-2886
regional part of nervous system7.51e-2853
regional part of brain7.51e-2853
tube4.62e-26192
anatomical conduit5.42e-26240
central nervous system6.15e-2681
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest9.04e-26132
cell layer1.28e-25309
epithelium2.29e-25306
nervous system1.05e-2489
brain2.12e-2468
future brain2.12e-2468
ectoderm-derived structure1.76e-23171
ectoderm1.76e-23171
presumptive ectoderm1.76e-23171
ecto-epithelium1.93e-23104
regional part of forebrain4.23e-2141
forebrain4.23e-2141
anterior neural tube4.23e-2141
future forebrain4.23e-2141
organ system subdivision3.28e-20223
pre-chordal neural plate2.16e-1961
telencephalon1.60e-1734
brain grey matter1.80e-1734
gray matter1.80e-1734
multi-cellular organism6.05e-17656
regional part of telencephalon2.08e-1632
cerebral hemisphere2.21e-1632
organ part1.39e-15218
regional part of cerebral cortex1.30e-1322
anatomical system1.73e-13624
anatomical group2.36e-13625
cerebral cortex5.36e-1325
pallium5.36e-1325
embryo9.25e-13592
neocortex2.02e-1220
developing anatomical structure2.75e-11581
germ layer6.40e-10560
germ layer / neural crest6.40e-10560
embryonic tissue6.40e-10560
presumptive structure6.40e-10560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure6.40e-10560
epiblast (generic)6.40e-10560
embryonic structure1.41e-09564
posterior neural tube2.94e-0915
chordal neural plate2.94e-0915
organ1.36e-08503
organism subdivision1.64e-08264
segmental subdivision of nervous system2.08e-0813
segmental subdivision of hindbrain5.36e-0812
hindbrain5.36e-0812
presumptive hindbrain5.36e-0812
compound organ5.77e-0868
mesenchyme9.40e-07160
entire embryonic mesenchyme9.40e-07160


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.15.30359
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.13.90467
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.13.3282
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.12.26659
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.11.31954
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.846801
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.16.20416
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.757898
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.21.20011
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.21.39232
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.711948
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.11.38935
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.455568
MA0163.15.63764
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.29.48295
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTBP2#1488362.71700033932814.049570681927e-060.000129179325732979
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0321032870802863
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0319539558172638
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0167081650363209
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0156361228949682
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0293593553956255
NANOG#79923329.24477848101273.99627955670032e-050.000735449234576608
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0275827998837857
TAF7#6879311.43306940492390.0006690181981945830.00541388436395816
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0328361262781896
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109073695891196



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.