Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2945

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:45, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2945_seminal_extraskeletal_leiomyoblastoma_thyroid_spinal_serous_ductus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr9:4299959..4299974,-p4@GLIS3
Hg19::chr9:4299979..4299996,-p3@GLIS3
Hg19::chr9:4300016..4300039,-p2@GLIS3
Hg19::chr9:4300050..4300118,-p1@GLIS3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multi-cellular organism5.39e-23659
anatomical system1.06e-21625
anatomical group2.48e-21626
organ3.85e-20511
organism subdivision9.59e-20365
embryonic structure1.25e-18605
developing anatomical structure1.25e-18605
embryo2.12e-18612
tube3.01e-18194
germ layer3.68e-18604
embryonic tissue3.68e-18604
presumptive structure3.68e-18604
epiblast (generic)3.68e-18604
anatomical conduit6.16e-18241
multi-tissue structure1.18e-17347
anatomical cluster2.01e-17286
cell layer3.78e-16312
epithelium4.39e-16309
central nervous system1.20e-1282
trunk mesenchyme2.44e-12143
brain2.55e-1269
future brain2.55e-1269
neural tube3.42e-1257
neural rod3.42e-1257
future spinal cord3.42e-1257
neural keel3.42e-1257
regional part of brain1.67e-1159
trunk2.33e-11216
neural plate3.35e-1186
presumptive neural plate3.35e-1186
regional part of nervous system9.33e-1094
nervous system9.33e-1094
neurectoderm1.50e-0990
epithelial tube6.06e-09118
mesoderm6.35e-09448
mesoderm-derived structure6.35e-09448
presumptive mesoderm6.35e-09448
adult organism9.58e-09115
regional part of forebrain2.94e-0841
forebrain2.94e-0841
future forebrain2.94e-0841
anterior neural tube3.70e-0842
gray matter5.29e-0834
brain grey matter5.29e-0834
head5.82e-08123
compound organ1.12e-0769
pre-chordal neural plate1.48e-0761
regional part of telencephalon1.52e-0733
duct2.15e-0726
telencephalon2.16e-0734
cavitated compound organ3.16e-0732
dermomyotome3.30e-0770
muscle tissue3.39e-0763
musculature3.39e-0763
musculature of body3.39e-0763
anterior region of body3.51e-07129
craniocervical region3.51e-07129
skeletal muscle tissue3.99e-0761
striated muscle tissue3.99e-0761
myotome3.99e-0761
mesenchyme5.85e-07238
entire embryonic mesenchyme5.85e-07238
somite6.59e-0783
paraxial mesoderm6.59e-0783
presomitic mesoderm6.59e-0783
presumptive segmental plate6.59e-0783
trunk paraxial mesoderm6.59e-0783
presumptive paraxial mesoderm6.59e-0783


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066445.360256373075030.001211145381643620.00820729383035805
EP300#203346.77394172622320.0004748459821442640.00435747645454396



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.