Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2693

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2693_anaplastic_nonsmall_bronchogenic_ovary_small_medulloblastoma_glassy



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr2:233352519..233352525,- p3@ECEL1
Hg19::chr2:233352531..233352550,- p1@ECEL1
Hg19::chr2:233352555..233352566,- p2@ECEL1
Hg19::chr2:233352573..233352580,- p4@ECEL1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data
disease_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
embryonic stem cell6.56e-135
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system4.32e-2081
nervous system1.03e-1889
neural tube1.25e-1856
neural rod1.25e-1856
future spinal cord1.25e-1856
neural keel1.25e-1856
regional part of nervous system3.14e-1653
regional part of brain3.14e-1653
adult organism2.31e-15114
neurectoderm1.15e-1486
neural plate1.57e-1482
presumptive neural plate1.57e-1482
brainstem4.11e-146
brain6.38e-1468
future brain6.38e-1468
organ system subdivision2.16e-11223
regional part of forebrain3.24e-1141
forebrain3.24e-1141
anterior neural tube3.24e-1141
future forebrain3.24e-1141
ecto-epithelium5.87e-11104
regional part of diencephalon3.02e-104
pre-chordal neural plate1.14e-0961
posterior neural tube2.51e-0915
chordal neural plate2.51e-0915
diencephalon8.54e-097
future diencephalon8.54e-097
neural nucleus1.15e-089
nucleus of brain1.15e-089
segmental subdivision of nervous system2.94e-0813
medulla oblongata4.14e-083
myelencephalon4.14e-083
future myelencephalon4.14e-083
ectoderm-derived structure6.41e-08171
ectoderm6.41e-08171
presumptive ectoderm6.41e-08171
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest8.21e-08132
anatomical cluster1.04e-07373
pons1.12e-073
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
lung small cell carcinoma4.74e-104
bronchus cancer8.26e-097
bronchogenic carcinoma8.26e-097
lung cancer3.03e-0715


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.14.74396
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.11.34758
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.12.02223
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.125954
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.69331
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.11.47051
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.866596
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.536981
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.11.29536
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.15.10287
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.569905
MA0146.11.25938
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.777367
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.20.199162
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.11.21162
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.640035
MA0163.11.90765
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.23.5408
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.11.1888
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
SUZ12#23512450.11578091106291.5827390373096e-078.83011123491334e-06



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.