Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1969: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0,0

Latest revision as of 11:56, 17 September 2013


Full id: C1969_neuroectodermal_neuroblastoma_occipital_Neural_colon_carcinoid_parietal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:131571466..131571487,+p9@AKAP7
Hg19::chr6:131571516..131571534,+p10@AKAP7
Hg19::chr6:131571535..131571595,+p2@AKAP7
Hg19::chr6:131571628..131571652,+p7@AKAP7
Hg19::chr6:131571662..131571673,+p13@AKAP7


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neuronal stem cell5.84e-148
neuron1.72e-106
neuroblast1.72e-106
electrically signaling cell1.72e-106
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system3.78e-6081
nervous system9.33e-5589
neural tube4.00e-5256
neural rod4.00e-5256
future spinal cord4.00e-5256
neural keel4.00e-5256
regional part of nervous system4.14e-4853
regional part of brain4.14e-4853
telencephalon4.19e-4434
brain grey matter8.12e-4434
gray matter8.12e-4434
regional part of forebrain2.43e-4241
forebrain2.43e-4241
anterior neural tube2.43e-4241
future forebrain2.43e-4241
brain3.50e-4268
future brain3.50e-4268
cerebral hemisphere1.19e-4132
regional part of telencephalon1.64e-4132
regional part of cerebral cortex1.46e-3722
neurectoderm2.71e-3686
adult organism4.94e-36114
cerebral cortex4.36e-3525
pallium4.36e-3525
organ system subdivision1.88e-34223
neocortex2.57e-3420
neural plate4.41e-3182
presumptive neural plate4.41e-3182
ectoderm-derived structure8.27e-29171
ectoderm8.27e-29171
presumptive ectoderm8.27e-29171
pre-chordal neural plate6.17e-2561
ecto-epithelium8.36e-23104
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.17e-19132
anatomical cluster1.81e-15373
temporal lobe6.35e-136
basal ganglion4.15e-119
nuclear complex of neuraxis4.15e-119
aggregate regional part of brain4.15e-119
collection of basal ganglia4.15e-119
cerebral subcortex4.15e-119
posterior neural tube6.49e-1115
chordal neural plate6.49e-1115
gyrus9.32e-116
neural nucleus3.58e-109
nucleus of brain3.58e-109
limbic system9.84e-105
intestine1.74e-0917
gastrointestinal system1.83e-0925
tube2.71e-09192
parietal lobe2.95e-095
occipital lobe3.11e-095
embryo7.55e-09592
anatomical conduit5.11e-08240
organ part5.49e-08218
telencephalic nucleus5.66e-087
multi-tissue structure7.99e-08342
developing anatomical structure1.16e-07581
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.80e-0712
hindbrain1.80e-0712
presumptive hindbrain1.80e-0712
embryonic structure2.23e-07564
organ3.04e-07503
multi-cellular organism3.30e-07656
germ layer3.55e-07560
germ layer / neural crest3.55e-07560
embryonic tissue3.55e-07560
presumptive structure3.55e-07560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure3.55e-07560
epiblast (generic)3.55e-07560
segmental subdivision of nervous system8.85e-0713


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.481059
MA0004.10.626788
MA0006.10.452993
MA0007.10.606704
MA0009.11.11255
MA0014.10.0418333
MA0017.12.14806
MA0019.10.784036
MA0024.11.00439
MA0025.11.24931
MA0027.12.73598
MA0028.10.470679
MA0029.11.02437
MA0030.11.01252
MA0031.10.945567
MA0038.10.736268
MA0040.11.03042
MA0041.10.64667
MA0042.10.612397
MA0043.11.11288
MA0046.11.10134
MA0048.10.195817
MA0050.10.613347
MA0051.10.731787
MA0052.11.03442
MA0055.10.603517
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.189508
MA0058.10.523638
MA0059.10.522232
MA0060.10.321781
MA0061.10.291022
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.736721
MA0067.11.43651
MA0068.10.247962
MA0069.11.09737
MA0070.11.08584
MA0071.10.695094
MA0072.11.0812
MA0073.10.00220137
MA0074.10.730989
MA0076.10.540943
MA0077.11.07324
MA0078.11.95181
MA0081.10.522409
MA0083.11.12028
MA0084.11.62584
MA0087.11.07867
MA0088.10.132006
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.556637
MA0091.10.629594
MA0092.13.58667
MA0093.10.456342
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.750974
MA0101.10.459973
MA0103.10.442769
MA0105.10.175503
MA0106.10.779931
MA0107.10.378225
MA0108.20.94238
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.5713
MA0113.10.797251
MA0114.10.973423
MA0115.11.35895
MA0116.10.382106
MA0117.11.1512
MA0119.10.504689
MA0122.11.17777
MA0124.11.31673
MA0125.11.23103
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.855546
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.14377
MA0136.11.76068
MA0139.10.277033
MA0140.10.692258
MA0141.10.520334
MA0142.10.912455
MA0143.11.87149
MA0144.10.356507
MA0145.10.143698
MA0146.10.0359558
MA0147.10.386018
MA0148.10.653474
MA0149.10.681935
MA0062.20.284987
MA0035.20.691506
MA0039.20.0118463
MA0138.20.837782
MA0002.21.50443
MA0137.20.47779
MA0104.20.320919
MA0047.20.767096
MA0112.20.839774
MA0065.22.73531
MA0150.10.550239
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.69926
MA0153.11.21379
MA0154.10.172764
MA0155.10.130813
MA0156.10.480289
MA0157.10.883854
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.386729
MA0160.10.669748
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0592265
MA0163.10.0439995
MA0164.10.810347
MA0080.22.01584
MA0018.20.781393
MA0099.20.699641
MA0079.23.83292e-05
MA0102.21.66336
MA0258.10.345771
MA0259.10.395396
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066455.360256373075030.0002259278299937090.0025024580164082



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.