Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3159

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:57, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3159_cerebellum_parietal_hippocampus_temporal_insula_frontal_postcentral



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:47616191..47616196,-p7@C1QTNF4
Hg19::chr17:40834385..40834392,+p6@CNTNAP1
Hg19::chr19:49941642..49941657,-p6@SLC17A7


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0015319sodium:inorganic phosphate symporter activity0.00706464146944542
GO:0015321sodium-dependent phosphate transmembrane transporter activity0.0164812521182351
GO:0005436sodium:phosphate symporter activity0.0164812521182351
GO:0015114phosphate transmembrane transporter activity0.0247167840339703
GO:0016493C-C chemokine receptor activity0.0275212931074951
GO:0019957C-C chemokine binding0.0275212931074951
GO:0001637G-protein chemoattractant receptor activity0.0275212931074951
GO:0004950chemokine receptor activity0.0275212931074951
GO:0019956chemokine binding0.0275212931074951
GO:0015296anion:cation symporter activity0.0275212931074951
GO:0005070SH3/SH2 adaptor activity0.0314253212205132
GO:0060090molecular adaptor activity0.0333704452132086
GO:0051480cytosolic calcium ion homeostasis0.0333704452132086
GO:0007204elevation of cytosolic calcium ion concentration0.0333704452132086
GO:0015103inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activity0.0333704452132086
GO:0030674protein binding, bridging0.0385573711424084
GO:0019955cytokine binding0.0385573711424084
GO:0015294solute:cation symporter activity0.0385573711424084
GO:0055074calcium ion homeostasis0.0385573711424084
GO:0006874cellular calcium ion homeostasis0.0385573711424084
GO:0006875cellular metal ion homeostasis0.0385573711424084
GO:0055065metal ion homeostasis0.0385573711424084
GO:0006817phosphate transport0.0385573711424084
GO:0042330taxis0.0385573711424084
GO:0006935chemotaxis0.0385573711424084
GO:0001653peptide receptor activity0.0385573711424084
GO:0008528peptide receptor activity, G-protein coupled0.0385573711424084
GO:0030005cellular di-, tri-valent inorganic cation homeostasis0.042863844773248
GO:0007626locomotory behavior0.042863844773248
GO:0055066di-, tri-valent inorganic cation homeostasis0.042863844773248
GO:0030003cellular cation homeostasis0.0431614103442473
GO:0055080cation homeostasis0.0431614103442473
GO:0042277peptide binding0.0431614103442473
GO:0008509anion transmembrane transporter activity0.0431614103442473
GO:0055082cellular chemical homeostasis0.0458795432522604
GO:0006873cellular ion homeostasis0.0458795432522604
GO:0015293symporter activity0.0458795432522604
GO:0015698inorganic anion transport0.0479694248685004
GO:0050801ion homeostasis0.0479878942586728



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system1.74e-8353
regional part of brain1.74e-8353
neural tube7.95e-7956
neural rod7.95e-7956
future spinal cord7.95e-7956
neural keel7.95e-7956
brain2.80e-7368
future brain2.80e-7368
telencephalon2.41e-6634
regional part of forebrain3.77e-6641
forebrain3.77e-6641
anterior neural tube3.77e-6641
future forebrain3.77e-6641
regional part of cerebral cortex7.87e-6622
central nervous system2.64e-6581
cerebral hemisphere8.89e-6432
brain grey matter9.48e-6034
gray matter9.48e-6034
nervous system2.13e-5889
cerebral cortex7.41e-5825
pallium7.41e-5825
regional part of telencephalon4.73e-5732
neocortex3.63e-5520
neural plate1.58e-5282
presumptive neural plate1.58e-5282
neurectoderm7.08e-5086
adult organism4.55e-46114
pre-chordal neural plate2.23e-4361
ecto-epithelium1.96e-40104
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.35e-33132
ectoderm-derived structure2.50e-28171
ectoderm2.50e-28171
presumptive ectoderm2.50e-28171
gyrus7.53e-266
organ system subdivision4.34e-22223
parietal lobe1.28e-205
limbic system5.11e-205
tube1.40e-19192
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.10e-1712
hindbrain1.10e-1712
presumptive hindbrain1.10e-1712
regional part of metencephalon7.53e-179
metencephalon7.53e-179
future metencephalon7.53e-179
segmental subdivision of nervous system2.76e-1613
anatomical conduit1.32e-14240
temporal lobe1.61e-146
posterior neural tube4.79e-1415
chordal neural plate4.79e-1415
middle temporal gyrus1.61e-132
Ammon's horn1.71e-132
lobe parts of cerebral cortex1.71e-132
hippocampal formation1.71e-132
limbic lobe1.71e-132
organ part1.33e-12218
occipital lobe1.86e-115
anatomical cluster5.04e-11373
epithelium2.72e-10306
cell layer3.87e-10309
cerebellum4.61e-106
rhombic lip4.61e-106
multi-tissue structure1.60e-09342
frontal cortex2.43e-093
brainstem2.77e-096
pons1.05e-083
postcentral gyrus1.18e-071
insula1.25e-071
nucleus accumbens1.33e-071
ventral striatum1.33e-071
paracentral gyrus1.51e-071
occipital pole1.83e-071
pole of cerebral hemisphere1.83e-071
olfactory region2.07e-071
primary subdivision of skull2.07e-071
cranium2.07e-071
neurocranium2.07e-071
chondrocranium2.07e-071
cartilaginous neurocranium2.07e-071
head paraxial mesoderm2.07e-071
corpus callosum4.34e-071
central nervous system cell part cluster4.34e-071
axon tract4.34e-071
intercerebral commissure4.34e-071
dorsal telencephalic commissure4.34e-071
brain white matter4.34e-071
brain commissure4.34e-071
white matter4.34e-071
nervous system commissure4.34e-071
cerebral hemisphere white matter4.34e-071
corpus striatum5.38e-074
striatum5.38e-074
ventral part of telencephalon5.38e-074
future corpus striatum5.38e-074


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.