Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2110

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:04, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2110_amygdala_occipital_medial_parietal_putamen_temporal_brain



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:128842905..128842917,-p13@ARHGAP32
Hg19::chr13:66878762..66878772,-p@chr13:66878762..66878772
-
Hg19::chr19:5681211..5681216,+p6@HSD11B1L
Hg19::chr6:24146395..24146398,+p@chr6:24146395..24146398
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0016491oxidoreductase activity0.0458024255269045



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube6.54e-7256
neural rod6.54e-7256
future spinal cord6.54e-7256
neural keel6.54e-7256
regional part of nervous system1.89e-6853
regional part of brain1.89e-6853
brain grey matter1.60e-6234
gray matter1.60e-6234
telencephalon1.76e-6234
regional part of forebrain6.42e-5941
forebrain6.42e-5941
anterior neural tube6.42e-5941
future forebrain6.42e-5941
cerebral hemisphere2.41e-5732
regional part of telencephalon3.95e-5732
brain1.64e-5668
future brain1.64e-5668
regional part of cerebral cortex4.71e-5522
neural plate7.94e-5482
presumptive neural plate7.94e-5482
central nervous system2.37e-5181
neurectoderm7.97e-5186
neocortex2.15e-4920
cerebral cortex5.48e-4825
pallium5.48e-4825
nervous system1.01e-4789
ecto-epithelium7.74e-47104
pre-chordal neural plate3.27e-4561
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest4.51e-31132
ectoderm-derived structure3.47e-29171
ectoderm3.47e-29171
presumptive ectoderm3.47e-29171
adult organism1.56e-28114
organ system subdivision1.47e-19223
gyrus4.83e-196
tube1.04e-16192
temporal lobe3.70e-166
basal ganglion5.16e-169
nuclear complex of neuraxis5.16e-169
aggregate regional part of brain5.16e-169
collection of basal ganglia5.16e-169
cerebral subcortex5.16e-169
occipital lobe8.83e-165
limbic system8.83e-165
neural nucleus1.18e-159
nucleus of brain1.18e-159
organ part4.24e-14218
posterior neural tube4.96e-1415
chordal neural plate4.96e-1415
brainstem3.82e-126
anatomical conduit2.76e-11240
epithelium3.81e-11306
cell layer6.33e-11309
segmental subdivision of hindbrain6.42e-1112
hindbrain6.42e-1112
presumptive hindbrain6.42e-1112
telencephalic nucleus1.28e-107
frontal cortex3.05e-103
anatomical cluster5.07e-10373
segmental subdivision of nervous system5.36e-1013
parietal lobe6.65e-105
pons9.80e-103
multi-tissue structure1.08e-08342
regional part of metencephalon6.15e-089
metencephalon6.15e-089
future metencephalon6.15e-089
organ1.17e-07503
middle temporal gyrus1.21e-072
amygdala1.29e-072
middle frontal gyrus1.81e-072
corpus striatum2.04e-074
striatum2.04e-074
ventral part of telencephalon2.04e-074
future corpus striatum2.04e-074
Ammon's horn2.78e-072
lobe parts of cerebral cortex2.78e-072
hippocampal formation2.78e-072
limbic lobe2.78e-072
locus ceruleus4.00e-072
brainstem nucleus4.00e-072
hindbrain nucleus4.00e-072


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.